From last year!I would also like to know this!!
Hey Guest, do you have a question for graduate recruitment? Gemma Baker from Willkie is live to answer your questions!
From last year!I would also like to know this!!
I thought there was a psychometric test after the application. So is it a telephone interview?
At the open day, one of the trainees said that her application process did not include a TI, so I think they might have used a psychometric test/another stage in previous years? But from attending 5-10ish events with them this year, can confirm it's app, TI, AC (interview, group exercise, written exercise), VS (which includes a research task and an interview).Yep, I think it’s a TI after the written app. Haven’t seen anyone mention a psychometric test just yet, but don’t quote me 😬
Many people applied in November and have not received the TI! Don’t rule yourself out yet 👍I submitted mine mid-November. Expecting a PFO!
Do you know if it’s the same platform as A&O and Simmons? Or same as HSF’s platform? Or another one entirely?Yes! It consists of potential scenarios that might arise with partners/associates when working on a pro bono case and they ask you to rank your answers
The first thing I'd recommend would be to pick a deal where you're already interested in one side more than the other, which it seems like you've done. I think you've taken the right approach but you need to flesh out why you're interested in picking this side more. What is about the licensing issues that interests you? Draw from your experiences- did you read something or work on something in this area that's sparking your interest in picking this side over the other?Good morning people, can I ask your opinion on something?I am trying to answer this question “Please tell us about a recent commercial deal that has captured your interest. If you could represent a side, which would it be and why? I am struggling a bit with the approach to take. I chose a deal and my idea is to represent the purchaser for 3 reasons: financial, commercial and legal given all the licensing issues. Is this the right approach?
I think somewhere in the middle maybe best- picking 2 to 3 points and fleshing them out may be better than stating 5 without backing them up with your rationale. The video interview is a chance for the firm to see how you present your ideas and thoughts in short timeframes so making sure that you're focusing on this rather than feeling the pressure to play a numbers game is super important. I hope this helps!When giving video interview answers (ie. with a set time limit), is it better to talk about fewer things in more depth, or more things but briefly? eg. for why this firm, would one reason be enough if I really expanded on my answer? I'm finding that I can't fit more than one thing into tight time limits, while explaining my reasoning at what I feel is a deep enough level.
Not generic at all! Personalising it by bringing in your values and why they matter to you is a great way to show a firm that you've not only researched them but also identify with their ethos.Hi all,
When answering "why this firm?", is it okay to talk about how their values on diversity reflect yours or is that too generic? I feel like every law firm is trying to be more diverse so that answer could be applied to any law firm. Should my answer be more specific if thats the case?
Congratulations!CMS AC invite after absolutely bottling their VI!!! I’m so surprised and shocked right now. I would really appreciate a PM or advice from anyone whose done their AC. I am really nervous about it.
Yep, I think it’s a TI after the written app. Haven’t seen anyone mention a psychometric test just yet, but don’t quote me 😬
Thank you so much!!Not generic at all! Personalising it by bringing in your values and why they matter to you is a great way to show a firm that you've not only researched them but also identify with their ethos.
Thank you very much for thisThe first thing I'd recommend would be to pick a deal where you're already interested in one side more than the other, which it seems like you've done. I think you've taken the right approach but you need to flesh out why you're interested in picking this side more. What is about the licensing issues that interests you? Draw from your experiences- did you read something or work on something in this area that's sparking your interest in picking this side over the other?
And then for each reason, flesh out why the related issues make you keen to represent it. So if you say you want to represent XYZ side for commercial reasons, what specific issues or aspects makes representing this side appealing to you? Is this side's commercial bargaining power stronger? Are the legal issues more complex/less complex? Do their financials make a compelling argument for the price they've offered?
I'm sorry to hear that you've been struggling with this.Hi I’m just really after some advice.
I really feel at a loss with what I’m doing wrong with my applications. I’ve sent out about 7 applications, starting with winter vacation schemes a few months ago and now some summer, but I have been rejected from everything. I cannot get past the application stage. I passed the benchmark for HSF, and I got invited to Gowling’s online test, so I passed the written portion - just to then just get rejected by both with no indication as to why. I have a first-class from a Russel group, and although I’m non-law I secured a role in a law firm so I also have law experience. I was on committees and sports teams at university and have had transferable work experience for like 7 years now. I attended webinars from the firms and the open days that I can.
I’d hope I’d come across quite well on paper, but it seems not.
I know it’s a super long process but I’m worried I’m going to exhaust all my efforts this year and not even get out of the application stages. Does anyone have tips on getting out of the application stage or similar stories to share? Just feeling defeated after another rejection