TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2021-22 (#1)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jessica Booker

Legendary Member
TCLA Moderator
Gold Member
Graduate Recruitment
Premium Member
Forum Team
Aug 1, 2019
14,659
20,354
Hi, for a question asking, "apart from law, what are you passionate about and why?", is this a section for me to talk about hobbies and interests or is it looking for something more intellectual, like issues/topics that I find important?
I’d be honest and talk about your passions - that doesn’t have to be intellectual. It just has to be the things you love dedicating time and/or effort to.
 

aspiringlawyer123_

Legendary Member
Dec 11, 2021
126
356
Hi @rose888,

Thanks for the question. This is a tricky one.

Firm choice can be (and arguably always is) very personal. I would argue so long as your reason for applying to each firm is independently strong, it should not be an issue that you have applied to a contrasting 'type' of firm.

The focus should be on your justification for applying.

For example, take a candidate that applied to two firms.

This candidate interacted with W firm in their first year at university, really liked their GR team and the trainees they spoke to inspired them. These are strong (initial) reasons for applying. Similarly, this person also applied to X firm because X are strong in disputes, having represented Y client who appealed to them because of Z, this would be a good reason to apply to this firm too.

If W had 50 overseas offices, yet X only had two in the UK, it is likely these firms are very different. Yet the candidate had strong reasons to apply to both as detailed above.

Firms can also appear very different in some ways, but actually be substantively similar in others. W and X might despite their contrasting international strategy, have particular strengths in disputes, or have a very small trainee cohort in London, or both offer eight seats to trainees during their training contract.

So long as you can give adequate justification and are able to demonstrate that you have thought your choices through thoroughly, you should be fine.

I also discussed this question on the Premium Forum here which might be helpful!
@George Maxwell So I have this question specifically for HSF also and I am just wondering whether you believe my reasons below are ok? So I essentially know that HSF are a full-service firm with strengths across numerous practice areas (corporate and disputes) but my specific reasons for my interest revolve around their strength in IP, allowing you to specialise in particular sectors in TC (specifically interested here in corporate strengths at firm and how I can specifically do life sciences/tech work here as interested in these industries), and their focus on innovation.

So in line with these reasons, I have also applied to firms like TW, Bird & Bird (which are actually quite different to HSF as not as well-rounded as they specialise more in these areas I am interested in). With this in mind, when speaking about other firms I have applied to and why and my motivation for HSF – would you say this reasoning isn’t strong enough/doesn’t apply to HSF enough or is fine because of their full-service nature and its natural to take a specific interest in certain things?

I hope what I am asking makes sense!
 
  • Like
Reactions: George Maxwell

Commerciallaw

Valued Member
Gold Member
Premium Member
Junior Lawyer
  • Aug 30, 2021
    111
    443
    Hi everyone!!! I have two questions i was hoping to get help for. I have a few ideas but i do now know if they are the main ones or even accurate.

    1) why do law firms keep track of non-billable hours.
    - is it because law firms want to be efficient i.e. if they see that a lawyer is doing a lot of non-billables they can reallocate the work. Also, to check if the non-billable work is actually non-billable (.e. mistakes in categorising)​
    - Maybe to consider increasing fees - so higher hourly rates?​
    - So lawyers can assess the time it takes them to do non-billable work​
    2) What are the adv/disadv of thought leadership?
    - Adv (demonstrates client responsiveness, awareness of clients opportunities and threats, expertise, build and attract client relationships, building reputation)​
    - disadv (other firms can use that information? costs to develop it?) - i really don't know what else could be a disadvantage​
    (edit) I want to also include accuracy - like if they are inaccurate in analysis (especially because mostly lower levels do the research etc..) then that could damage the reputation of the firm. But I do not know if this is accurate or even a good thing to say because the interviewer might feel personally attacked if I say they may not be accurate 😂​
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: George Maxwell
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    About Us

    The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

    Newsletter

    Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.