of course! but some firms have a pro bono secondment now which is interesting
You have to tread carefully even when they do have these great opportunities.
1) A trainee pro bono secondment is unlikely to be helping people directly. You will be helping the corporate entity behind the charity. The work you will be doing will feel very “corporate” - the work an in house lawyer does for a charity like Oxfam or Shelter will not be like helping people in a law clinic who don’t have access to legal advice. The only real difference in many instances to a fee paying international client and a pro bono client is that one is not paying for the service!
2) Pro bono should be seen like an extra curricular. Yes, some firms will ensure you get pro bono work whether via your billable time or through CSR initiatives, but it’s not going to be a decent chunk of your work and not enough to keep you motivated if that is a main criteria for you.
3) A reasonable proportion of your work as a corporate lawyer could be working against the principles many pro bono initiatives are set out to address. Your project finance matters could devastate/displace local communities; your oil client could be asking you to protect their interests after an oil spill; your restructuring work could lead to making thousands of people redundant; your tobacco client could be asking you to find ways to get around regulations that will ultimately lead to people getting ill from using their products. You are ultimately creating profit and although things like ESG are increasing, a lot of what you do will be driven by money and profits rather than the greater good. There is a risk that if your focus is on pro bono, people could question whether you are truly going to be motivated in an environment where a lot of the work you are doing is not always for society’s benefit.