Feel free to point me towards resources should there be any relevant to this query, afaik there aren't currently on this forum any directly relevant.
I have two cover letters to write to support applications for two direct TC's and I want to check I am on the right path.
For the why law I have mentioned what first sparked my interest in law, coming from a non law back grounds. I have then gone on to mention a previous career accounting and finance and how this piqued my interest in comm law.
For the why this firm, I have mentioned an interest in project financing and DCM following two courses I have taken post uni and how this relates to the preeminent practice areas of the firm I am applying to. I have then mentioned a project financing and why the financial instruments used interest me.
For why me, I currently have three disparate attributes or skills, that I have linked back to the firm, is this too many? As the paragraph seems rather lengthy atm (do these skills necessarily need to be linked back to the firm, as atm the links back to the firm in the final para sound rather contrived.
Any feedback on this approach, length and suggestions would be very much appreciated.
I have two cover letters to write to support applications for two direct TC's and I want to check I am on the right path.
For the why law I have mentioned what first sparked my interest in law, coming from a non law back grounds. I have then gone on to mention a previous career accounting and finance and how this piqued my interest in comm law.
For the why this firm, I have mentioned an interest in project financing and DCM following two courses I have taken post uni and how this relates to the preeminent practice areas of the firm I am applying to. I have then mentioned a project financing and why the financial instruments used interest me.
For why me, I currently have three disparate attributes or skills, that I have linked back to the firm, is this too many? As the paragraph seems rather lengthy atm (do these skills necessarily need to be linked back to the firm, as atm the links back to the firm in the final para sound rather contrived.
Any feedback on this approach, length and suggestions would be very much appreciated.