Hi all!!!! Just had a weird experience with the WGCTA. I've done quite a lot of these for other firms and passed them this season, and scored highly on the practices I've done. I just completed the test for CMS and when I came to the evaluating arguments section (which is usually my highest scoring area in the practices), it seemed like 10/12 arguments were 'Argument Strong'. Could this ever be the case? I had 10 minutes left to complete the test and found myself using most of that time trying to desperately find reasons why the arguments were weak so that I could change them and equalise my responses!
Does anyone have any understanding on this, and whether the tests would typically be structured to have a balanced amount of answers in each section? Also, are the test questions randomised for each person? I feel a little confused about it...
Thanks in advance
Does anyone have any understanding on this, and whether the tests would typically be structured to have a balanced amount of answers in each section? Also, are the test questions randomised for each person? I feel a little confused about it...
Thanks in advance