• Hey Guest, Have an interview coming up? We’ve opened new mock interview slots this week. Book here
  • TCLA Premium: Now half price (£30/month). Applications, interviews, commercial awareness + 700+ examples.
    Join →

General Discussion Thread 2020-21

Status
Not open for further replies.
I got rejected post VI after 3 months haha. I would send them an email, because they responded the day after I gave them a nudge!

Ahh thanks for letting me know. I only completed it yesterday lol. I am just being impatient because I know that some people who were successful heard back the same day!
 
Ahh thanks for letting me know. I only completed it yesterday lol. I am just being impatient because I know that some people who were successful heard back the same day!

Hi Camilla - I heard back two hours later (completed on Tuesday afternoon) and I know someone else completed it yesterday afternoon and heard back after 20 minutes! Fingers crossed you hear soon :)
 
How long does it usually take to hear back from HSF post AC? HSF seems to have a reputation for giving quick outcomes - I know that some people were notified of outcomes on the same day as the AC. I had my AC this Wednesday, but haven’t heard back yet. Really panicked in view of the weekend :((
 
Hi Camilla - I heard back two hours later (completed on Tuesday afternoon) and I know someone else completed it yesterday afternoon and heard back after 20 minutes! Fingers crossed you hear soon :)

Ahhhhhhhh I think its a rejection based on that. Damnit!

Thanks for letting me know though. Just going to focus on direct TC round now :)
 
Can anybody comment on whether candidates for ACs are generally grouped by the stage they're at in their studies?
i.e. would it be usual to segregate, say, non-law/pre-GDL from law/pre-LPC? Or is it a mixture of age, experience and knowledge, and a fight to the death? (Just kidding!)
 
  • Like
Reactions: M777
Can anybody comment on whether candidates for ACs are generally grouped by the stage they're at in their studies?
i.e. would it be usual to segregate, say, non-law/pre-GDL from law/pre-LPC? Or is it a mixture of age, experience and knowledge, and a fight to the death? (Just kidding!)

Same question, especially considering firms seem to invite people to ACs at different times!
 
Can anybody comment on whether candidates for ACs are generally grouped by the stage they're at in their studies?
i.e. would it be usual to segregate, say, non-law/pre-GDL from law/pre-LPC? Or is it a mixture of age, experience and knowledge, and a fight to the death? (Just kidding!)

This doesn't happen anywhere.

Slightly different expectations will be applied to the level of knowledge someone may have (e.g. first year non-law students vs a post-grad law student) but it doesn't mean people are grouped in a manner you are suggesting. Everyone is in the same pool for the specific vacancy they have applied to, and they have to meet the same standards.

Knowledge has a shelf-life to your career anyway, so it is not like having specific knowledge is necessary for the job/opportunity.

The only situation where a candidate will be differentiated, is at the point of offer and having to consider the additional costs of supporting them through the GDL. Some firms will work on a rough quota of law to non-law students (purely for budget reasons), but those firms will usually run separate application windows for non-law vs law students anyway.
 
Same question, especially considering firms seem to invite people to ACs at different times!

That is just done on either strength of application/assessments or when they applied (or both) - in many cases, it can just be down to pot luck.

It won't be done by degree subject or what stage of their academics they are in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M777
This doesn't happen anywhere.

Slightly different expectations will be applied to the level of knowledge someone may have (e.g. first year non-law students vs a post-grad law student) but it doesn't mean people are grouped in a manner you are suggesting. Everyone is in the same pool for the specific vacancy they have applied to, and they have to meet the same standards.

Knowledge has a shelf-life to your career anyway, so it is not like having specific knowledge is necessary for the job/opportunity.

The only situation where a candidate will be differentiated, is at the point of offer and having to consider the additional costs of supporting them through the GDL. Some firms will work on a rough quota of law to non-law students (purely for budget reasons), but those firms will usually run separate application windows for non-law vs law students anyway.
Interesting perspective. Thanks.
For clarification, I should have explained that I was referring to ACs for Vacation Schemes, rather than Training Contracts. Not that I don't feel I can hold my own, just concerned (as 3rd Year, non-law) whether everyone would be of equivalent level of legal knowledge. Your answer appears to be 'no'.
 
Interesting perspective. Thanks.
For clarification, I should have explained that I was referring to ACs for Vacation Schemes, rather than Training Contracts. Not that I don't feel I can hold my own, just concerned (as 3rd Year, non-law) whether everyone would be of equivalent level of legal knowledge. Your answer appears to be 'no'.

Still no different whether it is a VS or TC....

A VS to TC conversion is not going to be based on how much you know now, especially when you won't start for another 2-3 years.

What will determine it will be your willingness or ability to learn though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Get Our 2026 Vacation Scheme Guide

Nail your vacation scheme applications this year with our latest guide, with sample answers to law firm questions.