I was just reading about this and it made me so sadQuite tragically, the woman who spoke about Balance in her life passed away a couple of years after this video from a heart attack
I was just reading about this and it made me so sadQuite tragically, the woman who spoke about Balance in her life passed away a couple of years after this video from a heart attack
So ironic given that it seems every firm BUT GS is making changes... something tells me if they don't make a significant effort/response the turnover of associates/analysts will be even higher this summerHave heard rumours in the financial world that the fallout of the Goldman associate survey has been other banks (+ Apollo) dishing out bonuses as a thank you to associates!
No - there would be no sense in leaving out your VS. You don’t have to explain why you applied to other firms. You just have to explain why you are NOW applying to them, keeping in mind the firms you have previously applied to are more prestigiousHmm well I think I can justify my motivation for the firm pretty well, but I don't think I could directly address why I've applied to BOTH them and some of my other firms (e.g. I find it very hard to find much if any similarity between a high-end US PE-focused firm and a mid-market asset finance UK firm). So in that case, if the difference is so glaringly obvious, would it better to simply leave out my upcoming VS that I can't marry with this firm, even if my specific motivation for this firm is solid?
They are useful to you.How useful/helpful are virtual internships? Do recruiters value them?
Have done that- automated reply saying they'd be away till this tues but that's now passed... I'm just curious as to what's going on hahaIf they gave you a time frame by which you could expect to hear back and they've exceeded this quite substantially, I would say there's no harm in following up with an email. I know some people don't like doing this though through fear of looking impatient (myself included lol)
Happy to share publicly - based on information from people I'd spoken to (who have in-depth knowledge of the firm), my assumption going into the interview was that they would take significant interest in your extra-curricular activities and would really give you a chance to show off your personality, and would ask personal questions, like where else you'd applied.I'm curious, would you be willing to share why (feel free to DM if you'd rather not say publicly)? What did the interviewers do or not do that made you feel disappointed especially?
This is my new favourite videoIn the vein of funny youtube videos, my siblings just sent me this:
I think it's definitely worth remembering the principle that ACs are as much about you finding out if the firm is the right fit for you, as much as they're trying to see if you're a right fit for them. I know it sounds like a massive cliche and total nonsense, but it really does ring true.Happy to share publicly - based on information from people I'd spoken to (who have in-depth knowledge of the firm), my assumption going into the interview was that they would take significant interest in your extra-curricular activities and would really give you a chance to show off your personality, and would ask personal questions, like where else you'd applied.
Instead, you had this weird, very stale Q&A; I didn't get asked any follow-up questions to my answers, nor anything specifically related to my application - bar one question about some old work experience. They basically concluded the interview after 20 minutes (of the 30 allotted, 5 of which had already been used up on a presentation) and asked if I had any questions for them. I get that they might have decided I wasn't right by then, but I really felt like I hadn't had a fair crack at the whip at all.
I came across this problem also with VCovington yesterdayOdd question--is it my tech being weird or do some fairly major firms not come up on Legal 500? Like Reed Smith--when I try to look at their London profile I just get a message saying there are other ranked firms who are going to provide me with information instead. Am I going crazy or is this a thing? Is this just firms refusing to pay a membership fee or what is going on?
GenuineHi guys,
I recently had a rejection from Debevoise & Plimpton for their vacation scheme, but I was told by their Graduate Recruitment team that they were writing to me personally because they were impressed with my application and to apply again next year. Is that genuine or is it just fluff to soften the blow of the rejection?
Thankyou! ☺️ I seen a few myself but think it was for their Scottish offices xI saw two people get offered their VS yesterday on my LinkedIn so I don't think you'll be waiting too long! ☺️
Yeah, some firms aren't a part of it for some reason (quite a lot of US firms especially). I guess they feel that being a part of the Chambers & Partners directory is enough idk...Odd question--is it my tech being weird or do some fairly major firms not come up on Legal 500? Like Reed Smith--when I try to look at their London profile I just get a message saying there are other ranked firms who are going to provide me with information instead. Am I going crazy or is this a thing? Is this just firms refusing to pay a membership fee or what is going on?
Let me know how it goes! I have everything crossed for you xThankyou! ☺️ I seen a few myself but think it was for their Scottish offices x
Yeah, some firms aren't a part of it for some reason (quite a lot of US firms especially). I guess they feel that being a part of the Chambers & Partners directory is enough idk...
Completely unashamedly mine is TCLA ❤️I realised how boring and hyper-focused on job hunting my life has become recently when I discovered that Chambers and the Legal 500 were the no.2 and 3 most visited websites on my browsing history over the past year behind the FT. Might have to start putting down reading (and rereading when I forget) the law firm rankings as a hobby in the extracurriculars section of my next app at this rate!
Sad reaccs only pls