Hey Guest, do you have a question for graduate recruitment? Gemma Baker from Willkie is live to answer your questions!
Congratsss!!!!! is this for summer or spring and when did you apply, if you don't mind me asking ofcdechert VI - would reaaally appreciate any tips! Have no idea what to expect - don't even know how many questions there are or how long each answer is!
Depending on the equivalency scale used, a 2:1 can be anything from a 3.3 to a 3.7 GPA. Certain scales will say that anything over a 3.7 is equivalent to a distinction, while others will only consider a 4.0 a distinction, but from what I can tell they're in the minority. In most cases, only a fairly high 2:1 with be a 3.6 or 3.7.approximately a ~3.6-3.7 (i went to uni in the US and had to my GPA to UK system for my masters). if there's an opportunity to put 'other' and explain I would do that because you don't want them to think it's a 2.1 GPA – that's wildly different!
It’s completely random in the US tbh. At Harvard roughly 40% of people get above a 3.8 while at Princeton you would only need a 3.4 to put you in the top 40%. This is not about differences in student intellect but just that each university has its own distinct grading policy. Different states have different grading systems altogether - some allow you to get a GPA over 4.0 while some don’t on any course no matter how well you perform, meaning that an average of 4.0 is almost impossible - it would be equivalent to never EVER getting a module mark below 70. So it’s not really comparable at all, I would just recommend describing the UK system and where you fell (roughly) in your year groupDepending on the equivalency scale used, a 2:1 can be anything from a 3.3 to a 3.7 GPA. Certain scales will say that anything over a 3.7 is equivalent to a distinction, while others will only consider a 4.0 a distinction, but from what I can tell they're in the minority. In most cases, only a fairly high 2:1 with be a 3.6 or 3.7.
If you have recognised health reasons/conditions, you should be asking about reasonable adjustmentsJust looking for a bit of advice. I have an AC this coming Thursday and it's my first. It's been my only successful app so far (although do have 3 more to submit in the coming months) so v keen for it to go well. It's 9:30-3:30 and I've not been told about any breaks etc., although I assume there will be a lunch break somewhere along the lines. Due to some health issues (various stuff) I find mornings can be a little rough and on a bad day, getting up early will mean I'm exhausted by early/mid-afternoon. I'm just a bit worried about fatigue and the final exercise (of 3) is a partner interview which I'm most nervous for. Does anyone have any tips about getting through the day? (Also coffee doesn't help energy wise as caffeine makes me ill)
I will be writing something in the coming weeks. It is a very complicated thing though and giving general advice is tricky, as it will ultimately be down to your unique circumstances.Not sure if this is the right place to ask but does anyone know if there is an LPC V SQE thread of some sorts on the forum? I am feeling very conflicted as to what route to do for a variety of reasons and am doing as much research as I can!
My full first name isn't hard to pronounce or anything so not quite the same situation as yours, but I never use it and ALWAYS use my nickname (hearing my actual name makes me feel like I'm in trouble with my parents lol...) and I usually put the nickname as my 'preferred' name. If I have to email GR about something I always use my nickname as well, and it's my name on LinkedIn etc too. I've never had any trouble or confusion with firms for it!I have a weird, foreign, non-phonetic name. I have recently (within the last few years) begun using a shorter, phonetic abbreviation. Is it ok to use my abbreviation with firms or not?
I know a few people got rejections towards the end of last week but I am still waiting. But from what I heard people who applied after 27th or on deadline day got rejections already. I applied on like 15th January so dunno what that means. Hope this is helpful.Still no news from Macfarlanes recently?
I am in the process of finishing off my Baker McKenzie training contract application and sorry for posting this query in this thread.
In their question, I talked about their global breadth but mentioned the famous case that everyone discusses Hitachi's largest-ever acquisition of ABB's power grid business. Do you lot think I should discuss another deal as nearly everyone discusses this deal. I am worried about if I discuss this deal then it will not be unique. What do you lot think.
Thank you in advance for your help.
Thank you very much for your reply Dheepa.I agree with what everyone else has said about this. There's nothing wrong with discussing a particularly famous/well-known deal, it matters more what you're saying about the deal and how you're linking it back to why you're applying to the firm. You can very easily mention a firm's global presence without having to cite a deal to prove it. I'd encourage you to take your point one step further and think about how that particular deal and the markets/offices in involved on Bakers side, will make a difference to the kind of work you want to be involved in as a trainee.
Hello! does anyone have any advice specifically on what kind of knowledge I should have before attending a VS to give me the best chance of securing the TC? I don't mean things like being confident, enthusiastic, etc. I'm doing what I can to get a better understanding of what a law firm does, but I feel quite nervous about actually performing when it summer comes along and I have to go for the VS. Does anyone know if the online Forage courses help? Or are they a waste of time?
I’m in the same boat... but if everyone gets advice on how to convert a VS into TC then it will be the same as if no one has the advice lolI agree, I have no idea how to convert a vacation scheme into a training contract and I have a spring vacation scheme coming up. I've seen some threads about conversion, but they're not as detailed as I'd like and they're more-so about imposter syndrome rather than the work you do / how to build rapport and connections at the firm. I was thinking we should start a thread on this about how we can convert?
Fine to just go into it. Personal statements don’t need addressingNot strictly Vac scheme related but I'm doing an application form that has a 'personal statement' box, should I be addressing this to anyone or is it okay to go straight into it?
Edit: I've already sent a Cover letter and CV and was sent an app form to fill in