The general point that you've been making for years is that university 'prestige'/'brand'/'reputation' isn't something that grad rec are too fussed about. That's an empirical claim. You don't need to defend this decision normatively by saying that University X isn't tougher than University Y - all that matters is that your claim is true. We could prove it to be true by getting a bunch of grad rec in the same room and asking them the question everyone's been asking here tonight!What position do you mean?
All I said was that something was my experience. I did not argue that russel group students are better and I did not argue that non-RG students are worse, and I don't view them that way either. In response, I got a comment that had nothing to do with what I said. Pointing it out was treated as a cardinal offence even though nothing of what I said was actually rude. Only factual. In response, I was heaped with several comments deriding me for my tone. Those people don't seem to get a talking to about their tone though, despite it being far more actively insulting, including you who started this comment with the goal of "shutting me down". Everyone else in this thread bar one person has shared personal experiences rather than data as part of the discussion but for some reason those are treated as wholly accurate and correct while mine is "limited, biased and subjective".
I am aware that I am speaking from a very small pool of selective experiences. I even prefaced my first statement with an acknowledgement of it. I am also aware that various factors can impact on how results are assessed. I work to be as unbiased as possible. I came from a particularly shitty public school system back in my home country so I am well aware of how different teaching can be at "good" schools and "bad" schools and I tutor in order to help people who may be getting a worse education. So I don't think I'm deserving of a lecture by you, teacher or no.
I certainly will do she’s a bright individual way brighter than me. I’ll get her to message you privately with her concerns as I think it will be better coming from an expert GR like youTell her to come join the TCLA community. One of the reasons we exist is to try and level the playing field!
You can’t please everyone. As the community grows that will only more so be the case!Why the hell am I getting dislike reacts now - I bring memes what 😭
It is worrying, but not uncommon. He has no learning difficulties or EHCP. It's incredibly common in some schools. I've worked across three schools, one is a good school on the cusp of outstanding, one is good but recently out of special measures and the third is in and out of special measures and has some incredibly difficult children (there are electric fences and we were issued with rape alarms).if the student has learning disabilities, i fully withdraw my little chuckle but otherwise, that is quite worrying.
TCLA confuses me. On the one hand you get BNBR-style posts like this. On the other hand you get very aggressive/chippy posters that are all to happy to hide behind their anonymity and lash out. But when someone replies in kind it's back to BNBR. I think that more consistency either way would be nice. TSR and r/uklaw can turn into raging cesspits but at least you know where you stand!You’ve gotta be able to listen to the other side without being aggressive.
Jessica is obviously just tryna help
You remind me of Chris from Love Island - 'shall i rap to lift the mood a little bit'Why the hell am I getting dislike reacts now - I bring memes what 😭
There were no prizes at my university for my course. I could've got 100% in every single assessment and never would've been awarded a prize. In contrast, I know a course where over half of the students were awarded a prize of some kind.In my opinion the academic prizes question that most firms ask allows them to identify students who have performed better than the majority of their cohort
Ahahahha youre not the first to say thatYou remind me of Chris from Love Island - 'shall i rap to lift the mood a little bit'
Exactly! I don’t understand why people think getting a 2:2 from Oxford is more prestige than a first from a non-RG. Marking is done the same way and isn’t work externally marked too ??I came from a non-Russel group and there was the same approach to grades.
TCLA confuses me. On the one hand you get BNBR-style posts like this. On the other hand you get very aggressive/chippy posters that are all to happy to hide behind their anonymity and lash out. But when someone replies in kind it's back to BNBR. I think that more consistency either way would be nice. TSR and r/uklaw can turn into raging cesspits but at least you know where you stand!
Awww tysm - dm is always open This is my first cycle so I am learning just like youJust saw my rejection from Milbank vac scheme. Applied on the deadline.
Speaking as a dumb North American, I just want to say how grateful I am for this forum (which I only discovered a few weeks ago). Moved to London to be with my partner last year. It's been hella lonely + difficult figuring out how to best apply for vac schemes/training contracts. And although they probably don't know it, @Jessica Booker and @Celestie have hi-key given my applications a bit more of a fighting chance. Just need to keep rollin' with the punches/rejections.
BNBR?TCLA confuses me. On the one hand you get BNBR-style posts like this. On the other hand you get very aggressive/chippy posters that are all to happy to hide behind their anonymity and lash out. But when someone replies in kind it's back to BNBR. I think that more consistency either way would be nice. TSR and r/uklaw can turn into raging cesspits but at least you know where you stand!
I have no idea what this means but I'm sure that the sentiment behind it is a friendly one!It’s just not that deep