Just got an email from WFW Grac Rec after being rejected from the video interview asking me if I want a feedback call on my performance? Is this normal?
How confident are you in your knowledge of the core LLB/PGDL subjects, including Contract, Tort, Trusts, Land, Criminal, and Public Law?
TCLA is teaming up with BPP for a free interactive event designed to refresh your fundamentals, especially for those interested in or planning to take the SQE. We'll practise multiple choice SQE questions, with prizes for the highest scoring participants!
Register Herethank you!I think it would be rare for you to be asked both - I think it would be more likely to be one or the other.
However, if there was the opportunity to be asked both, I would focus "why law" on the topic of law and the type of key responsibilities you will have as a lawyer (research, drafting, document review etc) as things like working with legal frameworks and the ways in which you work/tasks you would do could be similar outside of commercial law but in areas like family or criminal law. You can then focus on why commercial topics in the latter question.
But I would listen carefully to the question and the context of what you have been discussing previously as it may be that your interviewer is effectively asking you why commercial law when just asking "why law".
Successful training apps, detailed Guides on all parts of applications, case study, interview, courses on different areas of law, law firm profiles, courses on finance, M&A and moreWhat’s on the premium resources?
From what I remember from the open day, I think it’s based on the performance of that year ( I know that’s annoying as that’s impossibly vague!!) However, these scores seem pretty solid so I wouldn’t worry if I were youI took the Stephenson Harwood test earlier and I think I scored 8766 across the four pillars (so 27/36 or 75%) and I think I got mid for verbal reasoning and high for numerical reasoning.
Does anyone here know what their benchmark is from previous cycles because I’m not sure what to think. I still have PTSD from the Paul, Weiss test that I did several weeks ago. 🥲🥲
From what I remember from the open day, I think it’s based on the performance of that year ( I know that’s annoying as that’s impossibly vague!!) However, these scores seem pretty solid so I wouldn’t worry if I were youI took the Stephenson Harwood test earlier and I think I scored 8766 across the four pillars (so 27/36 or 75%) and I think I got mid for verbal reasoning and high for numerical reasoning.
Does anyone here know what their benchmark is from previous cycles because I’m not sure what to think. I still have PTSD from the Paul, Weiss test that I did several weeks ago. 🥲🥲
Is this for spring?SH SJT invite!!
this is first contact after application, right? when did you apply?SH SJT invite!!
Probably if they’ve asked for it. You’ll get a starter checklist that basically just refers the law firm to your P45.Guys, does anyone know if i already have a p45, do i still need to fill in HRMC new starter checklist for the vac scheme?
what were the VI qs like? were there 4?I took the Stephenson Harwood test earlier and I think I scored 8766 across the four pillars (so 27/36 or 75%) and I think I got mid for verbal reasoning and high for numerical reasoning.
Does anyone here know what their benchmark is from previous cycles because I’m not sure what to think. I still have PTSD from the Paul, Weiss test that I did several weeks ago. 🥲🥲
Same, I can’t decide whether it’s a good thing or not!CRS London holding email![]()