I received written exercise todayhave people heard back (good or bad news, anything) from Dechert for their summer scheme? or for Cleary summer - I believe I saw some WG invites recently?
I received written exercise todayhave people heard back (good or bad news, anything) from Dechert for their summer scheme? or for Cleary summer - I believe I saw some WG invites recently?
When did you hear?Has anyone done K&L Gates verbal analysis test? Can't find anything on it at all
me! I wish they'd just put me out of my misery! how did you do?Anyone else waiting for that Paul, Weiss rejection? My amberjack was not good
Anyone else waiting for that Paul, Weiss rejection? My amberjack was not good
I generally think there is nothing wrong with using answers you formulated in your applications as well, although for some reason it seems many people initially assume that this is the case. Of course you can and should polish and tailor the answers for the purposes of the interview, perhaps by adding deeper insights and changing the phrasing for a more suitable one. However, I do not think any interviewers have an expectation for your answers to differ much in substance from your answers in the application form. In fact, it would be more concerning if your answers were radically different, as it would show either dishonesty or an instability in your fundamental motivations.Hi, I have an AC coming up next week. I wanted to get some thoughts on how to prepare for a CV-blind and application-blind interview. In such a case, can I recycle my answers from my applications, or is it unwise to do that? Similarly, how much in-depth research should I do into the firm? It's my first AC, and I'm really keen to get the VS. @Andrei Radu @Amma Usman any tips would be appreciated!
Paul, Weiss theory:
They may be looking for applicants who also have a good amount of legal experience too, kinda like a direct TC applicant would. Would you think considering its their first ever cohort, they would want students fresh out of uni with no experience? Just a thought I might be wrong
Thank you so much, this is so helpful! I’m just wondering how I can prepare on the commercial awareness front, as I’ve completely slacked on that. Thanks again!I generally think there is nothing wrong with using answers you formulated in your applications as well, although for some reason it seems many people initially assume that this is the case. Of course you can and should polish and tailor the answers for the purposes of the interview, perhaps by adding deeper insights and changing the phrasing for a more suitable one. However, I do not think any interviewers have an expectation for your answers to differ much in substance from your answers in the application form. In fact, it would be more concerning if your answers were radically different, as it would show either dishonesty or an instability in your fundamental motivations.
Regarding on your question as to how to prepare, I think mostly the same as you would for a normal competency interview:
On the last point, I think your research should be as extensive as it can be and I would definitely take at least half a day for it. Among the aspects that you should know, I would list the following:
- Build up the most extended and comprehensive question bank you can and find ideas to answer those question;
- Practice by recording yourself and then reviewing your performance;
- Do mock interview;
- Deepen your research into the firm and brush up on your commercial awareness.
- Basic firm facts: number of offices, financial figures, firm history
- Practice area/sector strengths and the firm's market position compared to competitors
- Recent big deals cases
- Recent awards and other forms of market recognition
- A few core clients
- Firm's business strategy and any recent developments (new offices, lateral hires etc)
- Training philosophy and details of the offering
Hi @pleasepleaseplease as I have never been assessed under this particular format I will not be able to speak from experience, but as I see it this exercise is set out to test mainly two things:Hi @Andrei Radu, how do you recommend preparing for an hour long analytical interview where I will be given an article to read for 30 minutes and after that two interviewers will ask me questions for an hour?
The article may be fictious and unrelated to current commercial issues and I will have to take business considerations into account and wider implications.
Interview is on Thursday so will be really grateful if you could share your thoughts at your earliest convenience.
To improve commercial awareness as much as you can over a short period, I advise you to do the following:Thank you so much, this is so helpful! I’m just wondering how I can prepare on the commercial awareness front, as I’ve completely slacked on that. Thanks again!
I'm going to say this isn't the case, on the basis that they put a lot of emphasis on wanting to develop a strong pathway from trainee to partnership. While this was mainly from the perspective that it fosters stronger teams compared to lateral hiring, I think it also demonstrates a commitment to growing talent from a fresh slate. They'll have to eventually, and they already have more than enough lawyers of all experience levels. Passing on those without legal experience feels against their current philosophy. They are a business, and those with more legal experience might appear a strong short-term move. However, I feel it would be a long-term detriment. At least on a micro scale. I assume they would take a balanced approach. That's my thinking, at least.Paul, Weiss theory:
They may be looking for applicants who also have a good amount of legal experience too, kinda like a direct TC applicant would. Would you think considering its their first ever cohort, they would want students fresh out of uni with no experience? Just a thought I might be wrong
Hey, have you done the test? Was it an SJT or Watson Glaser?Has anyone here done the critical thinking test for DAC Beachcroft and how did you find it! Is it a watson glaser and i'm hoping it's not too difficult 🥲
Paul mentioned during the open day that they ideally prefer students who can start their training contracts next year. As a result, it is highly likely that career changers, final-year students, and graduates will be prioritized. I'm uncertain how many of the 10 offers will go to penultimate-year students. I asked Paul if he knew what percentage of TC offers would allow for a start date in 2027. He stylishly avoided answering, saying that if there were outstanding applications that could start in 2027, those candidates would definitely receive an offer. I just want to raise awareness among penultimate-year students like me not to feel discouraged, even if you have a strong application, as the firm needs trainees as soon as possible.I'm going to say this isn't the case, on the basis that they put a lot of emphasis on wanting to develop a strong pathway from trainee to partnership. While this was mainly from the perspective that it fosters stronger teams compared to lateral hiring, I think it also demonstrates a commitment to growing talent from a fresh slate. They'll have to eventually, and they already have more than enough lawyers of all experience levels. Passing on those without legal experience feels against their current philosophy. They are a business, and those with more legal experience might appear a strong short-term move. However, I feel it would be a long-term detriment. At least on a micro scale. I assume they would take a balanced approach. That's my thinking, at least.
Okay thanks! What about the video interview, how many qs did they ask roughly, and how much about the firm?I did it last year and got the scheme. There’s nothing I could tell you to help you do better on it. You just have to attempt it and do your best. It was tough and you’ll need a calculator.