Oh ok, thank you for responding and educating me on that 🤣Forum slang for a rejection from a firm - stands for “please f*ck off”.
Oh ok, thank you for responding and educating me on that 🤣Forum slang for a rejection from a firm - stands for “please f*ck off”.
Ok thank you for responding and educating me on that 🤣It is an acronym for 'Please (the F-word) Off', which is one phrase that has been commonly used on the forums to refer to a rejection.
I normally went for two or three points, but if you the time limit is quite restrictive (say, 60 seconds) or if the reason both quite uniquely applicable to the firm and also very important to your experience as a trainee there, I think it is fine. For instance, I would not expect a recruiter at Kirkland to have an issue with you going very in depth on only one Private Equity-based motivation. However, if you applied for Latham and only mentioned their litigation practice as a why the firm reason, that may not suffice. This is because their litigation practice, while it admittedly distinguishes Latham from some US firms, is not as uniquely remarkable as Kirkland's PE practice; and because their litigation team is quite small compared to other departments, so it is a less central part of the firm than PE is for a firm like Kirkland.in a video interview about 'Why this firm', how many points would you say is sufficient enough? has anyone ever gotten past the vi stage citing one reason and going into detail about that?
yep PFOanyone heard back from Jones Day for the summer VS?
Sorry, can you elaborate on which F Word? 😂😂It is an acronym for 'Please (the F-word) Off', which is one phrase that has been commonly used on the forums to refer to a rejection.
This makes a lot of sense - thank you so much Andrei!I normally went for two or three points, but if you the time limit is quite restrictive (say, 60 seconds) or if the reason both quite uniquely applicable to the firm and also very important to your experience as a trainee there, I think it is fine. For instance, I would not expect a recruiter at Kirkland to have an issue with you going very in depth on only one Private Equity-based motivation. However, if you applied for Latham and only mentioned their litigation practice as a why the firm reason, that may not suffice. This is because their litigation practice, while it admittedly distinguishes Latham from some US firms, is not as uniquely remarkable as Kirkland's PE practice; and because their litigation team is quite small compared to other departments, so it is a less central part of the firm than PE is for a firm like Kirkland.
Hi, if I have to change the location from a regional office to London of my training contract- What would be a good reason and is it easy to change?
Hi, is it automatically sent? also how long prep + speaking time was it?omg omg that Reed Smith test and VI were BRUTAL😭😭
Pinsent PFO
Pinsent PFO !
Pinsent masons pfo, kinda upset because my feedback report was pretty good!!
London!I'm really sorry to hear that. I wish you all lots of luck on your other apps. Can I ask what office this was for?
I think it would be beneficial, for the same reason I believe referencing past unsuccessful vacation schemes is beneficial - it quickly communicates to the person reviewing your application the fact that another recruiter judged you to be a significantly stronger candidate than the majority of applicants. This in turn raises your credibility and makes them likely to take your application a lot more seriously.Hi all, looking for a bit of recruitment advice. I’m planning to apply to Burges Salmon soon. I did an AC with them in the cycle before last, and last year I applied for a paralegal job. Initially I was unsuccessful however I received a call back offering me a paralegal position in another department. I had to decline as I had another job, however is this something I can mention in my application and would it be beneficial or would it hinder the application? Thanks!
Hi have you heard anything back??Sounds good !! I got Supporter, Team Mentality and Flex as strengths, and Initiative as weakness! Hopefully were hear back soon!
Was there anything in the CV that suggested it was a week's placement? Or was it just that it was listed as Month Year?Thanks again, if the reasoning for the discrepancies was that I originally had the exact dates listed next to the title of the work experience but then edited this out for formatting purposes and forgot to change the description to match the changes, would the best approach be to explain this to the firm and then offer to send an updated version of my cv ?
Yes, the description states a week.Was there anything in the CV that suggested it was a week's placement? Or was it just that it was listed as Month Year?
Mine was for LondonI'm really sorry to hear that. I wish you all lots of luck on your other apps. Can I ask what office this was for?