Hey Guest, do you have a question for graduate recruitment? Gemma Baker from Willkie is live to answer your questions!
hey! may i ask when you completed the first test?Mayer Brown Trainee Job Simulation email. Has anyone done this before? Please PM me.
Early November.hey! may i ask when you completed the first test?
I also got both too. I think both firms recruit on a rolling basis. Weil is only for summer and same with Willkie. Wilkie’s application is still open till Friday the 20th, but Weil’s application closed on Sunday the 15th. I applied for Weil in the first week of december. Same with Willkie.If you dont mind me asking, when did u apply? And is this for summer?
Well done! Did you receive the separate email with the link for the VI? I received the email confirming that I have progressed an hour ago but am still expecting the email with the link for VIWeil VI! Any advice?
Please f*** off - forum speak for being rejected by a law firm, a polite-but-final rejection.What does PFO mean please 🥹
Great thank you for answering! Would you therefore suggest I focus on 2/3 things for that first question, rather than giving more in depth information about my CV?Just to jump in before @Jessica Booker or @Ram Sabaratnam get the chance to respond, I think you should write about your experiences and interests without worrying too much about overlaps with the information in the CV. The CV is meant to contain a short and factual summary of your experiences, while both the first and second sections are meant to give you the opportunity to expand on them a lot more. As such, it should not be very repetitive, especially if you write the answers section using a STAR structure and try to be reflective as to what these experiences and interests say about you as a candidate/person.
As for the word count issue, I would not necessarily have any 'target' word count, but I would normally look for something in the range of 300-600 words. I think your key focus here should be to extract the greatest possible value from your experiences while ensuring you observe the same norms of conciseness, formal writing style, and clear structure as if there was a strict word count.
thanks very much!Hi @member3804 I think to have a great AC group exercise performance, you need (1) to ensure you show the desired interpersonal traits like collaboration and leadership; and (2) you want to ensure you showcase the desired substantial commercial/legal analysis and negotiation skills, which necessitates taking up a sufficient portion of the airtime. Since everyone will want to speak enough to impress, there is a natural tension between the friendly and group-outcome oriented attitude required to excel at (1) and the individual performance focus in a competitive environment required to excel at (2). You will therefore need to walk a fine line to have an overall great performance.
While the way you should go about it will heavily depend on the format of the assessment, details of the exercise, and the strategies of the other participants, I have a few tips based on my own experience:
- Offer to keep the time: this shows a proactive attitude while not being very demanding as to your mental focus. It also enables you to (i) avoid taking the responsibility of any required writing, which is more demanding; and (ii) naturally intervene at certain points in the discussion to mention time considerations, which is also an opportunity for you to add substantive points.
- Try to introduce structure and organization: instead of simply throwing yourself in discussing substantive points, try to introduce a framework: what points will you discuss, in what order, how much time will you spend on each, and what relevant assessment criteria should you keep in mind when analyzing the points?
- Focus on finding more niche/less-obvious analysis points: as you are given a brief for the group exercise task, you will normally have a bit of preparation time during which you can think what points to bring up. You will find some points that are really intuitive which you will know the others likely also thought of. Instead of focusing on those and fighting with everyone to get to express those obvious points, I would use that time (and the extra thinking time in the initial discussion phase when everyone is fighting to say the obvious points) to find relevant ideas that others may have missed. The, as the discussion is winding down on that subpart of the task, I would mention these more niche points. This will avoid making you seem competitive and also showcase ability for more nuanced analysis.
- Focus on synthesis and weighing: another similar strategy for impressive contribution which may not require too much fighting over airtime is to once again seek to contribute as the discussion on the substantive points is winding down. What you can do here is intervene to summarize what everyone has contributed, weigh their points, and then make an informed argument as to what the decision should be.
Nope, still waiting for the linkWell done! Did you receive the separate email with the link for the VI? I received the email confirming that I have progressed an hour ago but am still expecting the email with the link for VI
I’m still waiting for my report after completing it on Friday. Not sure if I should emailHi guys,
How long after completing the Bakers test did you receive the assessment report?
The link is at the bottom of the email to take you to the CVMail website that we submitted our app forms! They said the due date is there but it isn't :'( I've emailed about the prep link not working though.Nope, still waiting for the link
lool, i had no idea that's what it meantPlease f*** off - forum speak for being rejected by a law firm, a polite-but-final rejection.
My email doesnt have any link at all thoughThe link is at the bottom of the email to take you to the CVMail website that we submitted our app forms! They said the due date is there but it isn't :'( I've emailed about the prep link not working though.