Hey, do you know if we get told our scores at all e.g. in a feedback report.I got an email from K&L Gates last week with a test.
Hey, do you know if we get told our scores at all e.g. in a feedback report.I got an email from K&L Gates last week with a test.
Sorry to hear thatFinally got Simmons PFO!
I'm so sorry to hear that, that must be so annoying. Now I'm worried because for two of my interviews, I went over omgJust received feedback from the US law that rejected me post AC. They told me that I excelled in the group exercise and I was good in the partner-technical interview (although I could elaborate more on some points). Apparently, the competency interview was my downfall. They told me that I didn't respect the 2 minute limit per question in 3 questions. That I shouldn't have talked for 3-4 minutes when answering the 3 questions. This is in stark contrast to a previous AC where I was told that I shouldn't be concise and I should speak for more than 2 minutes to elaborate more 😂.They also emphasised twice that it wasn't the content of my answers but the length of the 3 answers that was too much![]()
Thank you so much! Your answer and everyone else's has really really helped me!Basically, assumption made = is the assumption logically justified? In this case, its certainly reasonable to assume that managerial can be defined/quantified/measured etc.
Typically not more than 12 weeks unless it is a programme that has a fixed start date (like trainee intakes).Does anyone know how far out from the start date paralegal positions recruit from?
A really good tip an associate gave me for interview prep is if you’ve finished your answer and the interviewer pauses before asking you another Q, they are testing you to see if you remain steadfast or start talking again, its basically them saying it’s okay to stop if you don’t have anything further to say as most of the time they want you to stop so they can ask follow up Q’s etc.I'm so sorry to hear that, that must be so annoying. Now I'm worried because for two of my interviews, I went over omg
Nah, I wouldn't worry. I think it depends on the firm. In my case, I think they just didn't want me tbh. Which I understand, they had a lot of applicants for less than 10 spaces. I think penalising a candidate because of a couple of questions is just ridiculous. I interviewed at a MC firm back in time and I went over the 2 min limit a few times and still got the vac scheme. I think you'll be fine. Good luck!I'm so sorry to hear that, that must be so annoying. Now I'm worried because for two of my interviews, I went over omg
that is totally absurd. They just want some excuse to not hire you and the excuse is so lame and not decent. You must be super excellent and would definitely get a proper one.Nah, I wouldn't worry. I think it depends on the firm. In my case, I think they just didn't want me tbh. Which I understand, they had a lot of applicants for less than 10 spaces. I think penalising a candidate because of a couple of questions is just ridiculous. I interviewed at a MC firm back in time and I went over the 2 min limit a few times and still got the vac scheme. I think you'll be fine. Good luck!
Really helpful thing I read online somewhere was to read the initial statement and say to yourself "yes but you're assuming that..." and then the proposed assumption. If the proposed assumption would essentially trump the initial statement/win the argument then assumption is made. If it doesn't really make sense then assumption likely isn't made.View attachment 5823
Those who have taken Watson Glaser tests and understand the “assumption” part, please can someone explain this to me? I understand the other parts but for some reason when it gets to “assumption” I get confused.
Does “assumption not made” mean that the statement does not necessarily match with the assumption and “assumption made” would mean that the statement matches the assumption so correlates but is just re-worded?
Please could a question and answer be provided but also explained a little?
@axelbeugre @Jessica Booker do you perhaps have any tips on how I can better understand the “assumption” part of the WG? 😊
Got offer for AC in November for Winter VS but saying it was full so moving me to Spring/Summer and they haven't contacted me since despite x2 emails to grad rec :/Has anyone who applied for Dechert in October/November still not heard back? 😭
Yes, I heard from them for 2026 entry interviewHas anyone heard from Greenberg?
Congrats, was that last week?Yes, I heard from them for 2026 entry interview
SPB said they’ll get decisions out a week before the AC. I applied for London which would mean I’m hoping to get a decision by 12th March at the latest
I read this too, yesterday and it has helped me to understand it so much more. Thank you so much! (I like your username)Really helpful thing I read online somewhere was to read the initial statement and say to yourself "yes but you're assuming that..." and then the proposed assumption. If the proposed assumption would essentially trump the initial statement/win the argument then assumption is made. If it doesn't really make sense then assumption likely isn't made.
Not completely foolproof method but it's helped me a lot!