"Eligible candidates will need to be in the first year (or second year of a four-year course) of a law degree, or the second year of a non-law degree”
What about 3rd year of a 4 year non-law course, would that count?! Someone help! :) :)
I’ve just read this, and am wondering if someone can clarify it for me:
"with magic circle-style backstabbing notably absent among the trainees”
Is that saying very few trainees ditch the firm post-qualification for an NQ role at a MC place?
Much love as always :)
Massive shot in the dark here; are there any scientists on this forum who are also considering being a Patent Attorney and are torn between pursuing litigation or patents? I personally do not know which one I prefer, and would love to hear from someone in a similar position.
Thank you for the insight, could you suggest some places to go to learn the fundamentals? Any sites/videos you used in particular? I refuse to let ACs go badly if all it takes is a couple weeks work!
I feel exactly the same, I’m a penultimate year biochemist and managed to get an AC with HSF, was really passionate about working for a prestigious firm with a strong pharmaceutical IP team, got rejected because I wasn’t as strong on clauses and economical impacts of the contract. Beyond gutted...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.