I think the Colin/ Cuthbert dispute is really interesting on a number of levels. It really has caught the public imagination and it's got the nation talking.
From a legal perspective, I must admit that I understand & agree with M&S' case: if you look at all the various caterpillar cakes on the...
I agree with what Jessica says here - it's important to remember that perception and reality won't always align perfectly.
If I were you, I'd try and think outside the box here. Quite left-field examples can still be great and also are likely to set yourself apart from other candidates...
I think these things should generally be taken at face value: present it about something you're genuinely passionate about, don't try and fake your interest for the sake of the presentation as it will just seem contrived.
These presentations are much less about your substantive topic and much...
Yeah I think you're right, to be honest. As much as I'd love to see it from a personal perspective, it would cause uproar much in the same way the ESL did for all the same reasons.
Yeah precisely - as well as what Jessica mentions. Plus, Rugby is far and away the bigger sport in Wales so I'm not convinced there would've been the demand (though that is pure conjecture from my part).
Back in the day (I mean up to the 1990s, really) Scotland's football landscape was much...
To be fair, as a Rangers fan I would love to see us in a bigger league against better teams. An injection of cashflow from bigger fixtures would give us a fighting chance in Europe, attracting bigger names to the club etc.
Scottish football is completely stagnant and there's no money in it, it...
Hi, in my experience the TI is fairly brief, quite informal and is generally designed to feel out the reasons why you're interested in NRF as a firm etc - I honestly can't remember what I was asked, but I think it would be reasonable to expect to justify why law/ why you/ why NRF etc, maybe a...
Hate to be all lawyery about it, but it really depends.
The first thing to mention is that, simply by virtue of being in third year, you are not at a disadvantage to those who applied in second year for schemes. There are plenty of people who apply a lot later than this stage, so there's...
As Jess mentions, if the pitch is for a specific job, it will be led by the team who will lead the work (i.e. if it's a transaction, will be lead by relevant transactional lawyers/ if it's litigation, will be led by litigious lawyers etc).
If it's a firm pitching to become a panel firm for the...
I find this generally a really interesting discussion. I think, from a personal standpoint, a lot of lawyers get good at separating themselves personally/ emotionally from their work. Their job, obviously within the caveats and constraints of practice rules etc, is to do as good a job for their...
I have to be completely honest and slightly disagree with you here. Law firms represent controversial clients all the time without reputational damage; representing controversial clients is part of the job. Analogously, criminal QCs don't suffer reputational damage when representing those...
My winner this week is @AA99 for this open, frank discussion about post-VS rejections. As many will now have realised, I am a massive proponent of genuine self-reflection in all aspects of personal development, including the application process. I think this post epitomises what that is about...
As someone who really doesn't know much about tax law at all, this is really interesting and definitely shares a number of parallels with other areas of law. As someone who's really interested in company/ entity law, this discussion shares a lot of parallels with that area. Dheepa has already...
Totally understandable given your circumstances! I was in a similar position when I broke my back, more or less had to cut a lot of stuff out my life to focus on recovering so lost a lot of time where I would normally have worked on more personal development stuff for apps! Life happens, I'm...
Hey,
My articles on case studies and general interview skills/ prep are both available via the link in my signature if you've not yet had a read of them - hopefully they will help!
I would probably aim for 3+1 but I think 2+2 would be okay so long as you really emphasise the relevancy of the older ones so they don't seem redundant.
My TI (for VS) with NRF, answers varied a lot in length just owing to different types of things being asked. I would say answers will be 30 seconds to 2 minutes depending on the question! Hope this helps.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.