TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
427
642
I see Eversheds Sutherland have the same application questions as last year (and I think going back a few years before too).

Is there any advice anywhere on how to approach these and what they are looking for? Given they’ve been the same for a few years I haven’t found much, and the firm doesn’t have a Chamber Students profile, for instance.

Thank you!
Hi @James Wakefield while you may know about some of them already, here are resources I recommend:
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
427
642
@Andrei Radu
Describe how you think the innovative developments taking place in the legal industry will change the role of a commercial lawyer at Dentons. Please outline your research and reference the sources you used to inform your opinion.

This is one of the application questions from the Dentons Application. How would you recommend structuring this answer? How many developments should we talk about and how should we reference the sources?
Hi @a1024 so to separate the questions:

A. For structuring, as in other cases you can make a number of different approaches work, but I would go for something like:
  1. Explain a development taking place in the legal industry, and take care to focus on showing why this has been innovative - how is it different from the previous status quo.
  2. Explain how the development has generally impacted the work of commercial solicitors: are there any type of mandates that are more or less in demand as a result, processes that have been automize, particular skills that have become more or less useful as a result etc.
  3. Explain how the development impacts the work of Dentons lawyers specifically - impact to specific practice areas the firm focuses on, on its key sectors, impact to the needs of particular important classes of clients, etc.
B. As for what number of developments, there is no specific figure I can quote you. Somewhat unhelpfully, I think it depends on (i) the subject matter of the development itself - how much information do you have to convey for your answer to make sense; (ii) whether a given development can be connected with other developments you are considering writing about; and (iii) the level of depth you want to go into.

For the depth vs breath issue, the general rule is that depth takes priority. However, do not feel the need to show off your knowledge unnecessarily. For instance, say you have already covered everything central as to the explanation of a development and its impacts in one paragraph. In this case, instead of writing another paragraph covering more tangential points, I think it is better to choose a new development to write about.

C. As for referencing sources, I would likely do it as I am introducing a point - "As discussed in a recent FT article by ...". You do not think to provide full references, but just enough information to allow the reader to easily identify a resource on a google source. In practice this will likely only include the name of the publication and/or name of author and/or title.
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
427
642
What are the benefits of a six-seat training contract? Compared to the typical 4 seat structure.!
Three benefits I would consider writing about include:
  • Better for qualification decision making: a six-seat TC gives you 50% more options of seats you can qualify in. Moreover, by trying more practice areas and assessing commonalities and differences, you will automatically be in a better position to consider your experiences and be more informed in your decision-making.
  • Better for becoming a well-rounded lawyer: experiencing more seats will mean you learn more about a different types of work and relevant subject matters. Regardless of where you end up qualifying, this can arguably lead to you becoming a more well-rounded lawyer, as you will be able to consider the client's interest from more perspectives. Moreover, you could arguably take on more work yourself instead of having to rely on the support of your lawyers. For instance, if you end up becoming a corporate lawyer but have done a seat in disputes, you will be in a better position to negotiate the drafting of a dispute resolution clause without having to heavily rely on the support of colleagues in litigation.
  • Intrinsic benefit of pursuing interests: if you are interested in a higher number of practice areas instead of just two or three, a six-seat TC will give you more of an opportunity to experience work and learn about them. Arguably, this is a benefit in itself.
 

Andrei Radu

Legendary Member
Staff member
Future Trainee
Gold Member
Premium Member
Sep 9, 2024
427
642
Hi guys,

After seeing that a lot of US firms prefer students/graduates from Russell Group universities, i’ve been considering taking an LLM course at a Russell Group uni.

I was wondering if this could make a difference to my employability? For context, I have AAB equivalent at A-Level and a high 2:1 at a non-RG uni.

Thanks
Hi @studentdelaw786 there are indeed some US firms that are more oriented towards university prestige. I would assume that is likely a corollary of the so called 'campus interviews' recruitment system in the US, where firms go to the campuses of 'elite' laws schools and interview applicants there. However, I will specify that (i) not all US firms have this focus in the UK; and (ii) even the US firms that do have this focus end up having non-RG trainees - while it may be an important criteria, it is not an overriding consideration.

As for whether an LLM at an RG university would increase your chances with US firms, I think that is possible. However, I do not think the improvement in chances will be so significant to justify you doing an LLM only for this reason. An LLM is an important commitment of time, effort, and money. Moreover, in this period you could use your time to more effectively improve your chances in many other ways: submitting more high quality applications, to work experiences, networking, improving commercial awareness etc. I would only consider doing an LLM with a primary motivation to increase chances of getting a TC if you have already done your best to improve your chances in all these other ways.

Finally, although you have not asked this directly, I will say that even if your ultimate goal is to work at a US firm, you do not necessarily have to start your journey there. It is significantly easier to lateral at a US firm as an NQ than to get a TC there. Firstly, because as an NQ you are very profitable for a firm (in excess of 1 million/year at some firms), whereas as a trainee in many cases the firm is actually losing money in training you. Secondly, because the US firms commonly employ a model where they will take on substantially fewer people as trainees than they need NQs and then they will simply attract many NQs from other firms by offering higher salaries. As such, provided you are still interested in their work, I would not disregard the possibility of training at a different firm and then moving to a US one. In my vacation schemes at top US firms I have met plenty of people from a non-RG university who trained somewhere else and then could lateral without much difficulty.
 

Jessica Booker

Legendary Member
TCLA Moderator
Gold Member
Graduate Recruitment
Premium Member
Forum Team
Aug 1, 2019
14,648
20,344
If you're asked in a video interview how you will respond to negative feedback, should you still give an example of how you have done so? If yes, how do you link it in your answer @Andrei Radu @Ram Sabaratnam
You can use previous examples of how you have responded to feedback in the past, but I think it is important to frame this and lead with how you would respond in the situation the firm is asking you about first. Assuming this is a scenario of being in a trainee in a law firm, I would focus on the practical ways you might respond within the law firm first. You can always then complement it with how you have taken similar approaches in previous examples but this approach ensures you answer the question first.
 
  • 🤝
Reactions: Uch21

About Us

The Corporate Law Academy (TCLA) was founded in 2018 because we wanted to improve the legal journey. We wanted more transparency and better training. We wanted to form a community of aspiring lawyers who care about becoming the best version of themselves.

Newsletter

Discover the most relevant business news, access our law firm analysis, and receive our best advice for aspiring lawyers.