Thank you so much for the advice Jessica!
The practice area I'm drawn to the most is a one of the firm's main ones and the way they structure it is different to other firms, so I have a bit to say about why I like this in particular. I am, of course, interested in their other practices but the reasoning isn't as specific and strong, so I wasn't sure whether it was worth adding a few lines in or whether this wouldn't be perceived as a solid enough point.
Realise this is probably a really stupid question but what are you guys wearing in video interviews? Should I just wear a suit dress/suit. Do I need to wear a jacket? Or is smart causal (like a jumper) okay? Thanks
No worries! Thanks a lot! I just feel a PFO from them
Yup in the same position and also expecting a PFO lolAnyone still not received a WG from NRF? Expecting pfo now
Hi @em311,
As always, I think @Jessica Booker has broken this down really nicely in her post.
I would just add that as an interviewer, unless a firm's practice in London is extremely narrow and specialised, I would be concerned that, unless an applicant had previous experience of that area, too great a focus on a specific area might seem naive (purely because, from what I have been told, actually practicing and studying/researching an area of law are two very different things). It is important to show that you are open-minded as for the majority of firms you will have at least three other rotations during your TC.
So my advice would be, for application purposes, you may wish to speak about one area (as with limited word count you can only talk about so much with any development/depth). However, if you progress to interview, be ready for the Partner/your interviewer to probe you about your interest(s) in other areas (along the lines of, "You seem very focused on X in your application. How would you feel if you were sat in Y for 6 months?". In the vast majority of cases, just be willing to demonstrate that although you may have an inkling of an overarching interest in a particular practice area, this may change and that you are open-minded.
Hope that is helpful .
Hi @Hele25,
Not a stupid question at all! Personally, I always wore a full suit and tie (with smart shoes). I know others on the forum will only dress smartly from the waist upwards, wearing a tracksuit etc. However, I was concerned that I might need to get up in the interview for something unexpected (such as the door swinging open unexpectedly etc.).
I always wore a tie for both in-person and virtual interviews. Of course, some interviewers will find this unnecessary. However, it is better to be safe than sorry on these things. I had interviewers who were dressed very casually (in a t-shirt, for example), but others who were dressed in a suit and tie. I never wanted to be underdressed for an interview, so I would always dress up to be safe!
You don't have to wear a jacket if it is a video interview where the interviewers aren't there. Just anything smart/casual will be fine.Realise this is probably a really stupid question but what are you guys wearing in video interviews? Should I just wear a suit dress/suit. Do I need to wear a jacket? Or is smart causal (like a jumper) okay? Thanks
Pretty sure the deadline for WVS has passed?Hi all, I have been working on my NRF Spring VS for quite some time now and was wondering whether it would be more worth it applying for the winter one instead? Does it make a difference when you apply at the beginning of the application cycle (for winter) or does 2 weeks to deadline (for Spring) still give me a good chance? Thanks!
Sorry i didnt mean Winter I meant Summer****Pretty sure the deadline for WVS has passed?
Same question...If we haven’t heard back from any winter scheme applications is that a bad sign?
Don't mention legal concepts or buzzwords you do not feel comfortable explaining. From my personal experience, if you mention a specific legal principle or a buzzword then you could very likely be asked to explain it/provide a definition.Have my HSF AC this Tuesday and I think the thing I’m most nervous about is knowing your probably going to say something incorrect/be challenged by the interviewer.
Anyone have any tips on how to respond if you don’t know have the specific legal knowledge they’re questioning you on? Is there a good way to ask them to explain further before taking a stab at answering?