My very generous rule of thumb is apply in the first two-thirds of an application window if you can. Therefore if the applications are open from 1 November to 31 January means you could apply anytime up until the beginning of January and still have no issues.Hi all! Dont mean to bring negativity to this forum but just seeking peoples thoughts... Im currently interning and am a 2021 graduate and have been applying for vac schemes but no luck so far.. quite a few of the firms i have my eye on still have their deadlines coming up end of december/beginning of jan. I seem to find myself only able to submit applications so close to the deadline. if the firms are rolling (like alot of the ones upcoming in dec/jan), how much of an issue does this pose? what is the general rule of thumb when it comes to submitting an app for a rolling firm? Just feel quite overwhelmed and feel like this app season is slipping away
The WG is automatic, everyone gets it during the first stage.Does everyone get sent the WG test for DLA Piper or is it just those who pass the application stage?
I would go with the skills you came up yourself to make your app stand out. So many candidates will use the skills on Sidleys website...One of Sidley's questions is 'In your view which personal qualities make a successful lawyer?'
I've written up my own list, but revisiting their website just now they have a quite neat little 'what we look for' list of personal attributes.
While I'm pleased to find that there's significant conceptual overlap between their list and mine, I'm now wondering if I should shift gears/rewrite to focus more on what they obviously think are key qualities.
Are firms generally looking for their own material to be reflected back at them on these sorts of questions, or do they prefer something a little different? And if using their listed qualities, is it better to use the specific language they use or does it not matter? (ex. they list 'perserverance,' I had already written on 'resilience')
I also received two links but I only did one test. I have received my report so I am assuming it is all okGuys I have two links for the Mayer brown tests? I literally have two identical tests
May I ask you how long after did you receive your report?I also received two links but I only did one test. I have received my report so I am assuming it is all ok
I don’t know if the test is automatic but I applied a couple of weeks agoMay I ask if the tests were automatic for you? If not, do you mind me asking when you applied?
Perseverance and resilience although similar and often connected to me are different qualities. Resilience is often about being unfazed by challenging matters, while perseverance is more of a dogged determination that ensure success. One is more about how you feel and the other is more about what you do.One of Sidley's questions is 'In your view which personal qualities make a successful lawyer?'
I've written up my own list, but revisiting their website just now they have a quite neat little 'what we look for' list of personal attributes.
While I'm pleased to find that there's significant conceptual overlap between their list and mine, I'm now wondering if I should shift gears/rewrite to focus more on what they obviously think are key qualities.
Are firms generally looking for their own material to be reflected back at them on these sorts of questions, or do they prefer something a little different? And if using their listed qualities, is it better to use the specific language they use or does it not matter? (ex. they list 'perserverance,' I had already written on 'resilience')
I did my test on the 23rd November and received my report on the 25thMay I ask you how long after did you receive your report?
everyone gets it, but they send it every friday!Does everyone get sent the WG test for DLA Piper or is it just those who pass the application stage?
What is PFO please?Links PFO as well!
Thought I nailed WG and completed the Capp assessment logically and honestly...but onwards and upwards!
I'd suggest finding links between your own strengths as you would word them and the firm's values/ethos/vision. That way, it doesn't seem like you're simply telling them things you think they'd like to hear and it also demonstrates that you've thought deeply about why you're a good fit for the firm and vice versa.One of Sidley's questions is 'In your view which personal qualities make a successful lawyer?'
I've written up my own list, but revisiting their website just now they have a quite neat little 'what we look for' list of personal attributes.
While I'm pleased to find that there's significant conceptual overlap between their list and mine, I'm now wondering if I should shift gears/rewrite to focus more on what they obviously think are key qualities.
Are firms generally looking for their own material to be reflected back at them on these sorts of questions, or do they prefer something a little different? And if using their listed qualities, is it better to use the specific language they use or does it not matter? (ex. they list 'perserverance,' I had already written on 'resilience')
I am fairly certain that they are partially non-rolling. Unless anyone knows otherwise I think they give out VI & AC invites after the deadline but review on a rolling basis.Anyone got a Kirkland AC yet? Thankss