I'd take what I say next with a pinch of salt only because I read this somewhere and I don't remember how reputable it is but:
If there are terms like 'exceptional academics' or 'high 2:1', they are generally looking for good A-level grades and a high 2:1/first. Obviously, it is not limited to this and other factors come into play.
Interestingly enough, I was at an event at Linklaters the other day and one of the trainee solicitors told me that the A-level requirements were AAA but I haven't seen anything on their website or other sites that mention these requirements.
@AJ
Depends on the firm. From a management point of view, minimum academic entry requirements are an effective way for graduate recruitment teams to filter out some of the thousands of applications they receive. Despite this, there are firms like HSF, Linklaters, JD and many others that utilise mechanisms like Rare's Contextual Recruitment tool to assess A-level grades in comparison local attainment for applicants that fall short of the requirements.
Beyond that, unless you have extenuating or mitigating circumstances that can evidence why you haven't met the minimum requirements, firms are likely to reject you. However, there are some firms which adopt a much more holistic view on academic requirements in the larger context of you as an applicant. Firms like JD and Orrick notably mention that lacking grades in one area can be made up in another part of an application (in your case - good degree/GDL grades or impressive work experience).
Just make sure to do your research and recognise what different firms prioritise when assessing candidates. The 'Get Hired' tab on ChambersStudent is an excellent way to do this.
I totally agree.
If you apply to a place like MC/US firms, chances are they will reject you. However, if you are extremely dedicated
FreshFields runs on no a-level requirement and Herbet Smith Freehils also recently scrapped their a-level requirement.
So your best chances lie with those two, because your application will be judged upon your ability to convince them and not primarily on your grades.
I wish you well my friend. Go apply to their open days and if you get in, maybe you have a chance at FF and HSF.
I have been thinking the same as my A-Levels were BBB, I have quite strong mitigating circumstances for this but am still concerned this will be a way of filtering applicants.
This previous chat on TCLA might help you https://www.thecorporatelawacademy.com/forum/threads/how-important-are-grades-for-law-firms.319/
Its crazy man - I know some people that have had terrible A-level results but are at currently Clifford Chance and Freshfields.
But the amount of them is extremely low, and you have to think that those people were the best at their universities (non Russell group), so in essence, you have to ask yourself are you the best at your university and if not best, at the very least are you getting a First Class degree
You have to have a bait (like a FIRST CLASS DEGREE) for the MC/US/SC firms to hook onto, otherwise, they would look elsewhere.
I don't really agree with this. If you have a decent 2:1, you have a good chance at almost all MC/US/SC firms. The rest is down to you and your experiences. They'll take strong mitigating circumstances into account -- as whatever happened was out of your control.
I see whaf you mean - no harm causedApologies to everyone.
What I meant was, if you dont have mitigation circumstances, and have terrible A-Levels, then getting a First will/may stand you a chance with these firms.
I was in no way saying that people with mitigation circumstances have no chance at MC/US without a First.
I do apologise if somebody reading my earlier post felt offended.
@Jaysen would that be as well as filling in the mitigating circumstances section on the application? Thanks