- Feb 17, 2018
- 4,723
- 8,661
As @Raam, mentioned in this thread, Microsoft is currently in talks to buy TikTok's US operations: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-53628108.
Last edited:
Hey Guest, do you have a question for graduate recruitment? Gemma Baker from Willkie is live to answer your questions!
Current saga between Trump and TikTok is just very interesting:
Trump has ordered firms to stop doing business with the companies that own TikTok and WeChat within 45 days. The executive orders would prohibit “any transaction by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,” with the companies.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-53660860.
theguardian.com/technology/2020/aug/06/us-senate-tiktok-ban
That's gonna be expensive! I really feel for the advisors on this deal - so much for the usual quiet August! 45 days to get a deal of this magnitude and complexity over the line is going to be incredibly tough for the accountants, bankers and lawyers involvedIt's actually changed! Microsoft would like to buy TikTok's global operations - https://www.ft.com/content/45d739f5-37cc-4957-874d-a310c2ac8e07
Just Eat announced that will stop using gig workers. Basically, employees will get benefits and other work related protections. The company was bought by Takeaway.com and its CEO Jitse Groen will extend the model used for Takeaway to Just Eat.
This is a massive change since gig culture has always relied on the idea that employees do not have benefits in exchange of flexible work patterns "It is a gig not a work". I also believe, that Just eat is moving ahead of a potential judgment in favour of gig workers in the UK. The Uber appeal, is likely going to be in favour of the drivers after the last year's decision in favour of one of Pimlico's employees, and the recent decision in favour of Lyft and Uber drivers in California.
Additionally, Just East has just mad another move against UberEats and is doing much better with a revenue increase of 39%.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-53780299
Not sure if this is the right place to post - but does anyone have a good structure they like to follow when discussing a commercial topic? So I can include how it would affect the firm and clients, how it could be involved etc. I feel that I often just say what I remember rather than structuring it clearly?
I start with a brief summary of the story. I then cover the impact on the business (usually on its business model and structure), and after this I move onto the legal implications.
For example, Airbnb are set to announce that they will be filing for an IPO. I would look at why a company would undertake an IPO, and then tie it back to Airbnb and their current financial situation (why do they need to do the IPO now? Will they attract enough investor interest based on their recent financials and the effect of COVID? If this looks like a struggle, would they need to restructure their business model to save costs, thus appearing more financially attractive to investors?).
Then I would look at the work for law firms. For Airbnb's IPO, it would mean Capital Markets lawyers helping decide between between an IPO and direct listing, assisting with the prospectus and any potential clauses they might want to include based on Airbnb's market position. If a restructuring needs to commence before going public, then restructuring lawyers would be involved and you could suggest how Airbnb's individual entities would be affected.
If you wanted to explore in more depth, you could look at alternative sources of raising capital and whether these would be preferable to an IPO/ direct listing, especially in the current economic climate (Airbnb received equity & debt investment from Silver Lake and TPG Sixth Street at the start of lockdown).
Doing this for a handful of sectors/ stories means you develop strong commercial analysis skills quicker
Thank you both so so much!! This is so helpfulI was also told to use PESTLE!(obviously not all of the PESTLE analysis, but the major ones relevant to the story, like Legal, Economic factors etc!) which could link to the client(and legal factors linking to the firm directly!)
The above structure seems really really good though! Looks amazing
Hello everyone,
I hope you're all well. I came across an article about the change in Enterprise act 2002. Foreign firms that may be willing to take over the UK firms will have to face a big hurdle due to change in Enterprise Act 2002. The UK government, in response to the pandemic, will be able to intervene to protect the companies related to COVID-19 by adding a public interest consideration under the Enterprise Act 2002. They will make sure that these companies that are related to COVID-19 are not subject to mergers and acquisitions that are against the public interest.
I have figured how this can be a challenge as law firms will now have to make sure that the buyer’s takeover is not undermining the capability of the target firm to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 or future public health emergencies
However, I'm struggling to figure that how can a law firm turn this into an opportunity?
Interesting article! Note that where clients are faced with uncertainty like this, they'll be paying lawyers to understand the implications of the law on their business. On a simple level, this means one point might be an increased billing opportunity. It might also benefit law firms who have strong global practices (representing foreign firms looking to expand in the UK) and can therefore win instruction based on their ability to help clients navigate these regulations.