Sorry I haven't checked here in a long time (decided not to be a lawyer but that's a whole other story haha)
Unfortunately I didn't write anything down after my interview (first round) so I'll just post what I remember
I would say it was a fairly standard interview. The interviewers were very friendly, I didn't feel like they were trying to catch me out at all. A lot of the questions focused on me as a person and my experiences - how did I find school/university, how would my friends describe me, how do I spend my spare time etc.
There were also the standard why law, why Bristows, why do you think you would be a good lawyer
There were also competency questions - teamwork, dealing with conflicts, what annoys you about people etc.
I can only remember one 'law related question' which was about a start up scientific company. I can't remember the exact questions but there was something about how I would get funding (I said charities, research grants etc). I don't think they expect you to have the exact right answer, I think they just want to follow your thought process. If it looked like I was struggling they were helpful in suggesting a direction to think about.
I know I had looked up a couple of cases Bristows had worked on but I can't remember if they asked me about them!
My advice would just be to relax and just answer honestly. Think of a couple of questions to ask at the end, you could look up a bit about your interviewers and maybe ask them something relevant to them. The interviewers were very friendly though so don't be too scared and try and enjoy it as an experience as best you can!
Hopefully this helps someone!
_____________________________________________________
I'll just add this at the end - this is the advice I got from trainee I spoke to:
I had a very positive experience during my application process. People here are very friendly and will want a genuine conversation that shouldn’t feel too formal - but remember you are still being assessed! Here’s a couple of (hopefully) helpful guidance notes:
- It would be worthwhile looking up both interviewers once you find out who they are. Just know what areas they work in, and roughly what a lawyer does in those areas.
- Ask questions, preferably targeted towards what you’re interested in. I think it’s better if these questions are based on genuine interest about certain departments (preferably one they can comment on) rather than one like: ‘what are your thoughts about the emergence of US firms in London and the impact on the legal market’. For me, the latter seems like a question that is very general and designed to try to impress, but really, it’s a matter that doesn’t affect Bristows too much.
- Answer honestly (may sound obvious), but, for example, if you’re asked ‘how do you like spending your weekends’, don’t feel the need to say ‘reading patents’.
- As for types of questions to expect, I’m afraid it seems there’s not much off the table. From memory, there were a few of the typical questions, some on my background, some competencies, and plenty of others. The others included discussions about recent news (not necessarily IP/Tech/Pharma) as well as some on the feet thinking that you can’t really prepare for. I would recommend knowing in brief terms about some cases (probably 1-3) - some IP, some that Bristows have worked on. Those summarised by Bristows on our website would be a good start to finding relevant ones. Lexology (if you have a subscription) could be helpful here.
- A few questions are designed to make you think. I believe the best approach here is to say what you think (pretty much as you’re thinking it). I feel that a lot of people here think in their head and just deliver a final answer without showing their working. I think it’s much better to describe what you’re thinking, what you’re taking into account before finally saying what your ‘final answer’ is. It shows you can arrive at a sensible and reasoned conclusion.
- The interview isn’t designed to catch you out. Prepare well, then go in and try to enjoy it. The interviewers are all very nice