Nah I don’t think it’s reasonable to leave a comment on here telling people if they haven’t heard that they’ve been rejected when that assumption is based only on your personal interpretation.
It’s based on what it says in the email.
Nah I don’t think it’s reasonable to leave a comment on here telling people if they haven’t heard that they’ve been rejected when that assumption is based only on your personal interpretation.
I think the point is the email is open for interpretation, how you’ve read it you may see no likelihood that those who haven’t heard will be invited to an AC. That being said, when they said we would hear by Monday, on Monday many people were saying they were refreshing their emails (myself included) and that was okay.It’s based on what it says in the email.
I’m just using logic and common sense.
- It’s a bank holiday
- people who did the VI as recently as last Friday have had offers
- the ACs start on Tuesday
- the email doesn’t commit to letting you know if you have been unsuccessful by the 8th
- they sent out a holding email before when the timescale for responses was going to change, so the implication is that they have let successful people know (the evidence supports this)
I find that approach helpful in this situation but appreciate others may not.
If I’m wrong then I’ll donate £50 to charity by way of an apology.
I did call grad rec yesterday and she told me that it would take another 3 days before I heard anything back. But I agree with Changes that it doesn't look good, that said lets just keep marching forward to the next application.
Was it a general statement saying they are using another 3 days to get back to candidates? That's odd considering their email regarding the 8th.I did call grad rec yesterday and she told me that it would take another 3 days before I heard anything back. But I agree with Changes that it doesn't look good, that said lets just keep marching forward to the next application.
this is so weird why not just them say if you haven’t heard anything then your rejected why make people wait and wait and if she said it’d take another three days that would make no sense since they already said we’d need to hear by Friday
this is so weird why not just them say if you haven’t heard anything then your rejected why make people wait and wait and if she said it’d take another three days that would make no sense since they already said we’d need to hear by Friday
Was it a general statement saying they are using another 3 days to get back to candidates? That's odd considering their email regarding the 8th.
Maybe they are still reviewing VIs
it depends on whether the emails are automated. they may have been reviewing them til the end of the day yesterday to then send automated emails today?I just thought it might be unlikely that they’re working on a bank holiday
it depends on whether the emails are automated. they may have been reviewing them til the end of the day yesterday to then send automated emails today?
I don’t really understand the dislikes for a bit of realism and common sense.
Best of luck with your career in law if you can’t handle that.
I don’t really understand the dislikes for a bit of realism and common sense.
Best of luck with your career in law if you can’t handle that.