Hi @Jessica Booker - should the names of practice areas be capitalised e.g. "...firms specialising in Private Client and Real Estate" ?
Generally, no. Exceptions are if it is in a title (like a work experience heading) or if it is a title of something (like an award).Hi @Jessica Booker - should the names of practice areas be capitalised e.g. "...firms specialising in Private Client and Real Estate" ?
Great. Thanks!Generally, no. Exceptions are if it is in a title (like a work experience heading) or if it is a title of something (like an award).
Not common but it can happen.Hi Jessica,
Hope you are well.
Do you know if its common for law firms to lose/misplace an application.
I sent in an application in advance of the deadline to Eversheds and received a generated response via email that I would hear a response within 3 weeks.
Since then I haven't heard anything and the 3 week period has expired last week. I am aware that others have received rejections, invitations to VIs and subsequently invitations for ACs.
I have asked the firm about my application status and they said they would send all comms relating to applications by the end of this week. They alluded to the fact that most have already been sent. I have checked my spam and junk and still nothing.
Thank you Jessica, I'll send them an email thenNot common but it can happen.
I'd recommend contacting them on the 5th or 8th Feb if you havent heard anything - I don't think they have lost your application though, they are probably just behind schedule.
Technically all lower case for both, but look at how the firm writes the name in the body of text (not in headings).Hi Jessica, thanks again for your help on the forum. I was hoping you could clarify which of the below sentences is correct, in terms of capitalisation?
1) As Treasurer of the netball team
2) As treasurer of the netball team
and
3) The firm’s Cybersecurity and Data practice
4) The firm’s cybersecurity and data practice
Thank you!
Thank you 😊 I was unsure because I previously thought all lower case, but I noticed the firm used both lower case and capitals in the body of text when referring to their practice areas. I’ll keep it lower case just to remain consistent.Technically all lower case for both, but look at how the firm writes the name in the body of text (not in headings).
An application isn’t going to be unsuccessful by capitalising these type of words though.
Shows you it won't really matter either way!Thank you 😊 I was unsure because I previously thought all lower case, but I noticed the firm used both lower case and capitals in the body of text when referring to their practice areas. I’ll keep it lower case just to remain consistent.
I would just answer the question as it is. It could be that the firm doesn't want to an "why us" answer. Could easily be explored in later stages of the recruitment process and maybe they feel asking that question doesn't really help them get any useful substance/help them select the best candidates.Hi Jessica, I am working on an application for SA. Their questions are:
Why does a career in a city law firm interest you? (250)
Describe a current commercial issue that has interested you and explain why it interested you? (250)
In your view which personal qualities make a successful lawyer? (250)
Given that they don't have a 'why us', should I try to incorporate references to the firm in each of the questions or just answer the questions as they are?
Yes - it is possible for earlier parts of the process to still be considered.Hi Jessica,
When a firm is selecting candidates after the AC stage, will application forms or test scores still be taken in to account or is it all down to the day? Is the partner case study generally weighted more heavily or do competency interviews / group exercise / document checking all have equal importance? Thank you!
I think my only concern with this approach would be that it could come across like are not coming up with new ideas specific to the firm, you are just applying ideas you have implemented elsewhere.Hi Jessica
For the following application question:
What three proposals would you make to the Partnership if you were Chairperson of Ropes & Gray
I understand I should state my proposals, briefly explain how it would work and why it would be important. Is it worth adding a brief line or two mentioning that I introduced a similar initiative at uni/in the workplace and it also had X benefits. Or would this be diverging from the question?
I think my only concern with this approach would be that it could come across like are not coming up with new ideas specific to the firm, you are just applying ideas you have implemented elsewhere.
It may work (it’s really going to depend on the ideas and whether they practically apply to the firm too), but I guess I wouldn’t recommend putting in detail like this in, especially if it’s at a cost of fully explaining your rationale for your ideas.
Hi Jessica - I'm trying to answer the question "Why do you want become a solicitor and what attributes do you believe you need to excel in this field?" with regards to the second part, is it just asking for what are the attributes I believe solicitors need generally, or what attributes I believe I personally need? If it's the first one should I also be showing how I demonstrate those attributes? Thanks!