Usually they are not negotiable. Especially if they have several TCs available a year because all trainees are paid the same - you are being offered the salary for the role you are applying for not the one you have. Sucks but I’m in the same boat taking a pay cut from my paralegal salary to my...
I’m a 2.1 ex poly graduate with a merit in masters in an unrelated area of law from a RG and I have a TC with a US big law firm. It’s definitely doable. Happy to share more details if you wanna message me.
I’m going to be candid here but no. It’s not likely. It’s a lot to ask of someone you don’t know. Especially when in reality they are getting nothing in return. Also mock interviews take a lot of prep for the interviewer as they are expected to give feedback and trainees themselves probably...
I’ve done three law degrees (undergrad a masters and the LPC MSc) and have no idea what you mean by ‘the legal test’. Can you elaborate or give some further context?
you are not the first person to do this - its exactly why firms often have a reserve list!
I would reach out to GR of the firm you no longer wish to attend the VS with sooner rather than later with a polite email thanking them for the interest but saying unfortunately your circumstances have...
You can certainly ask - however the firm may not have alternative dates available. I had the same thing happen last year 3 ACs in the 2 weeks with a huge number of LPC exams! It’s doable - but definitely tough.
However you are responsible for the words you chose to put on the internet. I fail to understand how on the one hand you are calling a law firm discriminatory for guaranteeing interviews yet do not feel the need to not use discriminatory language yourself.
I didn't need to ask what you meant. I knew you meant disabled applicants on one hand and non-disabled on the other. There is nothing to settle, I merely pointed that the way I distinguished between the two characteristics was the way to do so without using ableist language. You are trying to...
I am struggling to see where I suggested that your intention was to cause offence. I don't think you intended to do so at all. However, regardless of your intention your choice of language could have been better, it came across in a negative and ableist manner and in a legal career the language...
I don't think I am being pedantic - I think calling someone out for ableist use of language is important and the more it's called out the less it will happen. I don't want to log into a forum where I offer advice and try and help people to be called not a normal candidate because I am disabled...
I'm going to use this argument at work tomorrow - I know the contract we drafted, negotiated and signed said this exactly but the intention was the opposite.
The issue was not you saying disabled candidate or candidate with a disability the issue was with you calling applicant without a...
You literally said 'normal candidate' and 'disabled candidate'. I am yet to see a law firm application have a box asking if you are a normal candidate, what you meant was someone without a disability. Language and its use matters.
I'm going to disagree - the base level is the same a minimum standard that all applicants have to reach. A disabled and non-disabled candidate have to meet that same standard. All the guaranteed interview means is the employer can't not interview them because of their disability and recognising...
No firm would do this. A disabled applicant would still need to reach the benchmark. They may be entitled to reasonable adjustments such as not doing a specific type of test because their disability means they cannot do it or they cannot be fairly assessed for it.
I didn’t wear a jacket for any of my virtual ACs, wore a professional looking blouse with sleeves but no jacket. I would have have absolutely melted in a jacket as I live in what is probably London's warmest building so didn’t need to add nervous heat to that!
Personally I don’t think my age made it any more of a battle than it already is! For context I was 28 when I received my TC offers last summer following two VSs. I was not the only person that age on the schemes and other trainees were that age or older! There is a real misconception that...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.