Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Why this firm for national firms (or non big ticket firms)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sarai" data-source="post: 109277" data-attributes="member: 16812"><p>Throughout my degree and with some social mobility initiatives I've been conditioned to think of magic circle, silver circle, US firms and elite global firms as the only place to train. However work life balance is really important to me, I have important responsibilities outside of work. So I was considering applying to national and regional firms in the hope for that work life balance. </p><p></p><p>1. Is work life balance really better in firms like Addleshaw Goddard and Pinsent Masons compared to elite global firms or silver circle firms?</p><p></p><p>2. How do you answer why this firm for a firm that doesn't have many or any tier 1 or 2 rankings or all their tier 1 or 2 rankings are in a specific sector? I use chambers and legal 500 for rankings and these differ a lot (legal 500 has a lot more rankings per firm but can be more generous than chambers). Based on careers advice I got during uni looking up rankings and recent deals are a good way of finding why you want to work for the firm. Also what is a good reason for working at a firm that doesn't do big ticket work?</p><p></p><p>I am ambitious and like to be intellectual stimulated so I would like to do great work but also at a firm that values work like balance. If you have suggestions please send them?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sarai, post: 109277, member: 16812"] Throughout my degree and with some social mobility initiatives I've been conditioned to think of magic circle, silver circle, US firms and elite global firms as the only place to train. However work life balance is really important to me, I have important responsibilities outside of work. So I was considering applying to national and regional firms in the hope for that work life balance. 1. Is work life balance really better in firms like Addleshaw Goddard and Pinsent Masons compared to elite global firms or silver circle firms? 2. How do you answer why this firm for a firm that doesn't have many or any tier 1 or 2 rankings or all their tier 1 or 2 rankings are in a specific sector? I use chambers and legal 500 for rankings and these differ a lot (legal 500 has a lot more rankings per firm but can be more generous than chambers). Based on careers advice I got during uni looking up rankings and recent deals are a good way of finding why you want to work for the firm. Also what is a good reason for working at a firm that doesn't do big ticket work? I am ambitious and like to be intellectual stimulated so I would like to do great work but also at a firm that values work like balance. If you have suggestions please send them? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Why this firm for national firms (or non big ticket firms)?
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…