Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Are you a future trainee?
We're hiring at
TCLA
. Apply by midnight on
31 March 2025
.
Apply Now
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Why This Firm? 🤔💭 : Crafting Applications
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Amma Usman" data-source="post: 184009" data-attributes="member: 36740"><p>Hi TCLA Community! 😁 </p><p></p><p>I created this thread because we all know that October is the season of drafting more and more applications for law firms. Knowing that you want to work at a particular firm is one thing; effectively demonstrating why <strong>that</strong> specific firm interests you is another. There are thousands of law firms out there—so why, for example, <strong>ABC Solicitors </strong>and not <strong>DEF Solicitors</strong>? What is it about <strong>ABC </strong>that makes it stand out to you? Why does it stand out? Couldn’t you find similar opportunities at <strong>DEF or GHI Solicitors? </strong></p><p></p><p>This thread dives into how to craft a compelling <strong>“Why This Firm?”</strong> answer, helping you elevate your applications from generic to targeted and persuasive. </p><p></p><p><strong><u>🔄 Convincing Reasons vs. Generic Reasons </u></strong></p><p></p><p>You’ve probably heard me emphasise this point before, and I keep coming back to it because it’s crucial. Understanding the difference between an answer that sells and one that feels generic can be tricky if you’re new to law firm applications. </p><p></p><p>So, what makes a response generic? A generic answer is one that could be applied to multiple firms or even different industries altogether—whether investment banking, consulting, or marketing. If your response is too broad, it won’t reflect a genuine interest in the firm. On the other hand, a compelling response captures your personal journey and demonstrates why <strong>this</strong> firm is uniquely suited to your goals and aspirations.</p><p></p><p>The key is to pinpoint your motivations clearly and align them with what the firm offers. Let’s distinguish between a strong and weak answer through the examples below:</p><p></p><p><strong><u>📝 Compare Two Responses</u></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Example 1:</strong></p><p></p><p>“I am applying for a training contract at <strong>ABC Solicitors</strong> because my father was a law professor, and I’ve always been interested in a legal career. Studying law confirmed my passion, and I know <strong>ABC </strong>is the firm for me, as it has offices worldwide, which will allow me to build my understanding of multiple cultures. The chance to work on cross-border deals is a significant selling point, and regional law firms may not offer me this exposure.”</p><p></p><p><strong>Example 2:</strong></p><p></p><p>“I am drawn to training at <strong>ABC Solicitors</strong> due to my interest in a private equity career. Attending an open day at <strong>XY Fund</strong> piqued my interest in value creation within private markets. I then attended an open day at <strong>GHY Solicitors, </strong>where I observed how legal teams navigate private equity deals from start to finish. During a practice case study, I assessed business and legal implications during fund formation and exit and received valuable feedback from a senior partner. <strong>ABC Solicitors’ </strong>Band 1 ranking for private equity solidified my desire to explore this practice area at a firm of its calibre.”</p><p></p><p><strong>Breaking Down the Difference</strong></p><p></p><p>It’s clear the second response is stronger. But why? </p><p></p><p>The first example, while it shows interest in a legal career, is too vague. It doesn’t demonstrate a strong motivation for a <strong>commercial </strong>legal career, nor does it highlight anything specific about <strong>ABC </strong>that differentiates it from other firms. Additionally, when articulating your passion for a firm or a career in law, it’s essential to ensure that your motivations come from a place of personal interest rather than solely external influences. While having a parent or mentor in the legal profession might have sparked your initial curiosity, attributing your desire to pursue a legal career entirely to them can weaken your narrative. It can make it seem like you’re following someone else’s path rather than carving out your own. External influences can certainly play a role in shaping your early exposure, but law firms want to see what excites <strong>you</strong> about the work, how <strong>you</strong> have explored this interest independently, and what experiences have solidified <strong>your</strong> unique perspective. By focusing on specific encounters—whether through legal work experience, research, or events—you can better demonstrate genuine interest and show recruiters that this is <strong>your</strong> chosen career, not just a decision guided by someone else’s influence.</p><p></p><p>The second response is detailed and compelling because it ties directly into the candidate’s experiences and interests. It reflects the candidate’s knowledge of the firm’s strengths, their passion for private equity, and the steps they’ve taken to explore this interest further. This specificity is key. Without it, even a well-written response will lack the personal touch that sets top applications apart. </p><p></p><p>But there’s a catch—if <strong>ABC </strong>is not known for its private equity practice, this answer could raise a red flag. A recruiter might wonder: why is the candidate referencing private equity when our expertise is in, say, competition law? If private equity is their core interest, why not apply to a firm with a stronger practice in this area?</p><p></p><p>The takeaway here is that specificity needs to be backed by accurate research. Even if your interest is genuine, if it’s not aligned with the firm’s strengths, it can weaken your application. Make sure you know the firm’s specialities inside out before you craft your response.</p><p></p><p><strong>🔎 Another Example: Pro Bono Work</strong></p><p></p><p>Let’s say a candidate expresses interest in <strong>ABC</strong> because of its strong pro bono practice. That’s a good starting point, but it needs more detail. Pro bono work is something that <strong>many </strong>firms do. So, what is it about <strong>ABC’s</strong> pro bono work that appeals to you? Maybe they collaborated with a charity that focuses on educational support, which links to your own experience mentoring young students. If there are additional intricate points which show this type of pro bono work is unique to the firm and not commonly found elsewhere, then you’ve successfully shown a deeper and more tailored interest in what sets the firm apart. Now you’re demonstrating that you have a genuine and specific interest in what makes <strong>ABC’s</strong> pro bono unique, rather than offering a blanket statement that could apply to multiple firms. </p><p></p><p><strong>🔑 Key Takeaways:</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>1. Be Specific:</strong> Reference firm-specific attributes—whether it’s their standout practice areas, or unique approach to training.</p><p></p><p><strong>2. Personal Connection: </strong>Connect your experiences to what the firm offers.</p><p></p><p><strong>3. Research, Research, Research: </strong>Thoroughly investigate the firm’s core strengths. LinkedIn, firm websites, and even casual conversations with current trainees can help you gather details that make your answer stronger.</p><p></p><p>Ultimately, when asked, <strong>“Why this firm?”, </strong>your answer should combine your personal journey, research-driven insights, and a clear understanding of what makes <strong>this</strong> firm special. With these tips, answering the “Why This Firm?” question should feel much less daunting. 🌟</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Amma Usman, post: 184009, member: 36740"] Hi TCLA Community! 😁 I created this thread because we all know that October is the season of drafting more and more applications for law firms. Knowing that you want to work at a particular firm is one thing; effectively demonstrating why [B]that[/B] specific firm interests you is another. There are thousands of law firms out there—so why, for example, [B]ABC Solicitors [/B]and not [B]DEF Solicitors[/B]? What is it about [B]ABC [/B]that makes it stand out to you? Why does it stand out? Couldn’t you find similar opportunities at [B]DEF or GHI Solicitors? [/B] This thread dives into how to craft a compelling [B]“Why This Firm?”[/B] answer, helping you elevate your applications from generic to targeted and persuasive. [B][U]🔄 Convincing Reasons vs. Generic Reasons [/U][/B] You’ve probably heard me emphasise this point before, and I keep coming back to it because it’s crucial. Understanding the difference between an answer that sells and one that feels generic can be tricky if you’re new to law firm applications. So, what makes a response generic? A generic answer is one that could be applied to multiple firms or even different industries altogether—whether investment banking, consulting, or marketing. If your response is too broad, it won’t reflect a genuine interest in the firm. On the other hand, a compelling response captures your personal journey and demonstrates why [B]this[/B] firm is uniquely suited to your goals and aspirations. The key is to pinpoint your motivations clearly and align them with what the firm offers. Let’s distinguish between a strong and weak answer through the examples below: [B][U]📝 Compare Two Responses[/U] Example 1:[/B] “I am applying for a training contract at [B]ABC Solicitors[/B] because my father was a law professor, and I’ve always been interested in a legal career. Studying law confirmed my passion, and I know [B]ABC [/B]is the firm for me, as it has offices worldwide, which will allow me to build my understanding of multiple cultures. The chance to work on cross-border deals is a significant selling point, and regional law firms may not offer me this exposure.” [B]Example 2:[/B] “I am drawn to training at [B]ABC Solicitors[/B] due to my interest in a private equity career. Attending an open day at [B]XY Fund[/B] piqued my interest in value creation within private markets. I then attended an open day at [B]GHY Solicitors, [/B]where I observed how legal teams navigate private equity deals from start to finish. During a practice case study, I assessed business and legal implications during fund formation and exit and received valuable feedback from a senior partner. [B]ABC Solicitors’ [/B]Band 1 ranking for private equity solidified my desire to explore this practice area at a firm of its calibre.” [B]Breaking Down the Difference[/B] It’s clear the second response is stronger. But why? The first example, while it shows interest in a legal career, is too vague. It doesn’t demonstrate a strong motivation for a [B]commercial [/B]legal career, nor does it highlight anything specific about [B]ABC [/B]that differentiates it from other firms. Additionally, when articulating your passion for a firm or a career in law, it’s essential to ensure that your motivations come from a place of personal interest rather than solely external influences. While having a parent or mentor in the legal profession might have sparked your initial curiosity, attributing your desire to pursue a legal career entirely to them can weaken your narrative. It can make it seem like you’re following someone else’s path rather than carving out your own. External influences can certainly play a role in shaping your early exposure, but law firms want to see what excites [B]you[/B] about the work, how [B]you[/B] have explored this interest independently, and what experiences have solidified [B]your[/B] unique perspective. By focusing on specific encounters—whether through legal work experience, research, or events—you can better demonstrate genuine interest and show recruiters that this is [B]your[/B] chosen career, not just a decision guided by someone else’s influence. The second response is detailed and compelling because it ties directly into the candidate’s experiences and interests. It reflects the candidate’s knowledge of the firm’s strengths, their passion for private equity, and the steps they’ve taken to explore this interest further. This specificity is key. Without it, even a well-written response will lack the personal touch that sets top applications apart. But there’s a catch—if [B]ABC [/B]is not known for its private equity practice, this answer could raise a red flag. A recruiter might wonder: why is the candidate referencing private equity when our expertise is in, say, competition law? If private equity is their core interest, why not apply to a firm with a stronger practice in this area? The takeaway here is that specificity needs to be backed by accurate research. Even if your interest is genuine, if it’s not aligned with the firm’s strengths, it can weaken your application. Make sure you know the firm’s specialities inside out before you craft your response. [B]🔎 Another Example: Pro Bono Work[/B] Let’s say a candidate expresses interest in [B]ABC[/B] because of its strong pro bono practice. That’s a good starting point, but it needs more detail. Pro bono work is something that [B]many [/B]firms do. So, what is it about [B]ABC’s[/B] pro bono work that appeals to you? Maybe they collaborated with a charity that focuses on educational support, which links to your own experience mentoring young students. If there are additional intricate points which show this type of pro bono work is unique to the firm and not commonly found elsewhere, then you’ve successfully shown a deeper and more tailored interest in what sets the firm apart. Now you’re demonstrating that you have a genuine and specific interest in what makes [B]ABC’s[/B] pro bono unique, rather than offering a blanket statement that could apply to multiple firms. [B]🔑 Key Takeaways: 1. Be Specific:[/B] Reference firm-specific attributes—whether it’s their standout practice areas, or unique approach to training. [B]2. Personal Connection: [/B]Connect your experiences to what the firm offers. [B]3. Research, Research, Research: [/B]Thoroughly investigate the firm’s core strengths. LinkedIn, firm websites, and even casual conversations with current trainees can help you gather details that make your answer stronger. Ultimately, when asked, [B]“Why this firm?”, [/B]your answer should combine your personal journey, research-driven insights, and a clear understanding of what makes [B]this[/B] firm special. With these tips, answering the “Why This Firm?” question should feel much less daunting. 🌟 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Why This Firm? 🤔💭 : Crafting Applications
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…