Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 207618" data-attributes="member: 36777">I would. Besides this definitely being valuable legal work experience, having a VS offer is a very impressive achievement that will immediately distinguish you from the majority of other applicants. Essentially, I believe it has the effect of instantly communicating to graduate recruitment that you were deemed to be a top 98-99% percentile candidate by a peer firm. This will invariably have an important impact in both (i) boosting up your candidate profile; and (ii) making graduate recruiters look at your application through different eyes, and thus making it more likely they will rate other aspects of it higher as well. Even if they wanted to assess the rest of it independently and objectively, there is a lot of research in social psychology indicating that knowledge of peer opinions has a prevailing impact on one's evaluative judgements. This is particularly impactful in situations presenting a high degree of ambiguity and discretion, and I would argue the decision of whether to classify an application as a whole (so, one involving the multi-faceted assessment of a lot of factors) as &quot;good, but not quite impressive enough&quot; or &quot;great, impressive enough to progress&quot; has exactly those features.As such, my view is that you would be doing yourself a disservice in not including the upcoming scheme. However, you can try to reduce the risk of it seeming like you put it there merely for purposes of impressing by adding in the description section (i) a short summary as to why you had applied for this firm and what your general applications strategy has been; and/or (ii) the seats you will do in the scheme and the work you expect to complete; and how that will be relevant for the development of your skills.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andrei Radu, post: 207618, member: 36777"] I would. Besides this definitely being valuable legal work experience, having a VS offer is a very impressive achievement that will immediately distinguish you from the majority of other applicants. Essentially, I believe it has the effect of instantly communicating to graduate recruitment that you were deemed to be a top 98-99% percentile candidate by a peer firm. This will invariably have an important impact in both (i) boosting up your candidate profile; and (ii) making graduate recruiters look at your application through different eyes, and thus making it more likely they will rate other aspects of it higher as well. Even if they wanted to assess the rest of it independently and objectively, there is a lot of research in social psychology indicating that knowledge of peer opinions has a prevailing impact on one's evaluative judgements. This is particularly impactful in situations presenting a high degree of ambiguity and discretion, and I would argue the decision of whether to classify an application as a whole (so, one involving the multi-faceted assessment of a lot of factors) as "good, but not quite impressive enough" or "great, impressive enough to progress" has exactly those features. As such, my view is that you would be doing yourself a disservice in not including the upcoming scheme. However, you can try to reduce the risk of it seeming like you put it there merely for purposes of impressing by adding in the description section (i) a short summary as to why you had applied for this firm and what your general applications strategy has been; and/or (ii) the seats you will do in the scheme and the work you expect to complete; and how that will be relevant for the development of your skills. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?

Search

Search

Reply to thread