Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andrei Radu" data-source="post: 183231" data-attributes="member: 36777"><p>Unless the firm asks you to discuss 'why law' and 'why the firm' in the same question (eg 'Why do you want to begin a legal career at out firm?'), I don't think there will be any expectation for you to tailor it to the firm. Thus, I do not think it is necessary to find any direct links or connections between your 'why commercial law' reasons and your 'why the firm' motivations. I did not do it in the past application cycle and was still successful with applications to both top US and MC firms. I actually think it might be disadvantageous to attempt this, as it will take up significantly more of your time and will also lead you to try to shoehorn your 'why law' and 'why the firm' reasoning. </p><p></p><p>As such, I think that once you manage to write a high-quality answer to why commercial law, you can generally reuse it in other applications. That said, there are exceptions to this rule. I think the following are situations where you should be willing to modify your model 'why commercial law' answer:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If your 'Why commercial law' answer would undermine your 'Why the firm' motivations. For instance, if you discuss your interest in highly-complex international litigation work as the origin for your interest in commercial law, this will not fit well when you are applying for a very transactional-focused firm. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If the experiences you discuss as part of your 'why commercial law' answer would better fit your 'why the firm' answer. You want to avoid repetition in the application and in general it is more difficult to find experiences that have connections to the more particular features of a specific firm when compared to finding experiences with connections to the more general features of commercial law. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Differences in word count limits: For instance, if your model why commercial law answer is 250 words, but the word count limit in a new application is 500 words, I do not think you should reuse it. Recruiters might expect you to fully use the available space and you should therefore expand on your previous answer. </li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andrei Radu, post: 183231, member: 36777"] Unless the firm asks you to discuss 'why law' and 'why the firm' in the same question (eg 'Why do you want to begin a legal career at out firm?'), I don't think there will be any expectation for you to tailor it to the firm. Thus, I do not think it is necessary to find any direct links or connections between your 'why commercial law' reasons and your 'why the firm' motivations. I did not do it in the past application cycle and was still successful with applications to both top US and MC firms. I actually think it might be disadvantageous to attempt this, as it will take up significantly more of your time and will also lead you to try to shoehorn your 'why law' and 'why the firm' reasoning. As such, I think that once you manage to write a high-quality answer to why commercial law, you can generally reuse it in other applications. That said, there are exceptions to this rule. I think the following are situations where you should be willing to modify your model 'why commercial law' answer: [LIST] [*]If your 'Why commercial law' answer would undermine your 'Why the firm' motivations. For instance, if you discuss your interest in highly-complex international litigation work as the origin for your interest in commercial law, this will not fit well when you are applying for a very transactional-focused firm. [*]If the experiences you discuss as part of your 'why commercial law' answer would better fit your 'why the firm' answer. You want to avoid repetition in the application and in general it is more difficult to find experiences that have connections to the more particular features of a specific firm when compared to finding experiences with connections to the more general features of commercial law. [*]Differences in word count limits: For instance, if your model why commercial law answer is 250 words, but the word count limit in a new application is 500 words, I do not think you should reuse it. Recruiters might expect you to fully use the available space and you should therefore expand on your previous answer. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Vacation Scheme Applications Discussion Thread 2024-25
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…