Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2024-5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Amma Usman" data-source="post: 206827" data-attributes="member: 36740"><p>Hi there,</p><p></p><p>The way I see it… as VIs are short one-way interviews with many questions asked, there isn’t so much scope to cover everything. You will (depending on the firm) have about 60-90 seconds to answer each question. Your idea to include 2-3 points is great, but may come at the expense of you being able to adequately answer the question to the fullest. As it says a news story, I believe one central trending topic, together with short descriptions of why it interests you (perhaps consider linking to your own work/life experience, something you read or watched) would be the more direct approach. This will enable you to hit the nail on the head and overwhelm yourself less with trying to cover the broader impacts of a law firm’s position in it all.</p><p></p><p>In my experience, video interviews typically tripped me up because I had so many things running through my head, only few of which were actually relevant to the question being asked. What helped me was walking into them with the intention of focusing on only one (very rarely, two) points and expanding on them in great detail. On more soft tips to ace these… hand gestures, vocal intonation, and overall presentation, also help elevate your responses.</p><p></p><p>This is an example of what I might say (adjusted to say a 60 second answer) to your question:</p><p></p><p>- The news story I have picked is one which aligns with the proposed changes in the 2024 Employment Rights Bill. </p><p></p><p>- Briefly explain the change - For example, the UK now offers statutory sick pay from day one, including for about a million low-income workers who were previously ineligible. </p><p></p><p>- Highlight why it matters– This ensures workers don’t feel pressured to work while sick, improving public health and financial security. </p><p></p><p>- Link it to employment law – It reflects a shift towards fairer workplace rights and protections, for example. </p><p></p><p>- Make it personal – Studying employment law, this demonstrates evolving employee rights and it interests me because of X Y Z.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Amma Usman, post: 206827, member: 36740"] Hi there, The way I see it… as VIs are short one-way interviews with many questions asked, there isn’t so much scope to cover everything. You will (depending on the firm) have about 60-90 seconds to answer each question. Your idea to include 2-3 points is great, but may come at the expense of you being able to adequately answer the question to the fullest. As it says a news story, I believe one central trending topic, together with short descriptions of why it interests you (perhaps consider linking to your own work/life experience, something you read or watched) would be the more direct approach. This will enable you to hit the nail on the head and overwhelm yourself less with trying to cover the broader impacts of a law firm’s position in it all. In my experience, video interviews typically tripped me up because I had so many things running through my head, only few of which were actually relevant to the question being asked. What helped me was walking into them with the intention of focusing on only one (very rarely, two) points and expanding on them in great detail. On more soft tips to ace these… hand gestures, vocal intonation, and overall presentation, also help elevate your responses. This is an example of what I might say (adjusted to say a 60 second answer) to your question: - The news story I have picked is one which aligns with the proposed changes in the 2024 Employment Rights Bill. - Briefly explain the change - For example, the UK now offers statutory sick pay from day one, including for about a million low-income workers who were previously ineligible. - Highlight why it matters– This ensures workers don’t feel pressured to work while sick, improving public health and financial security. - Link it to employment law – It reflects a shift towards fairer workplace rights and protections, for example. - Make it personal – Studying employment law, this demonstrates evolving employee rights and it interests me because of X Y Z. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
TCLA Direct Training Contract Applications Discussion Thread 2024-5
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…