Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
My Training Contract Journey
My Daily Commitment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="al97" data-source="post: 151658" data-attributes="member: 29424"><p>22 Oct - Commercial Awareness - Tech </p><p>Topic: How US Export Control on Chips Hindered the $69bn Broadcom-VMware deal</p><p><a href="https://www.ft.com/content/b23d2a9f-d873-43e4-9032-632d4e9d438c" target="_blank">https://www.ft.com/content/b23d2a9f-d873-43e4-9032-632d4e9d438c</a></p><p></p><p>The Export Control restricted Chinese chip growth in three different ways </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">One, only outdated chips made fell within the permitted grade. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Two, chips that have already been tailor-made for Chinese companies cannot be shipped. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Three, US companies cannot ship to China or even their subsidiaries in the states. </li> </ul><p></p><p>US chipmaker Broadcom’s acquisition of cloud software VM was made in May 2022</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">⅓ of Broadcom’s $33bn billion last year came from shipment to China </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Beijing is likely to delay or block the transaction now that US tightened the export control. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Shares price of VM dropped about 9%, Broadcom 2%</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Chinese M&A regulatory process now involves another layer of review that involves consultations with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In other words, Broadcom catches itself at the worst timing amidst export control war between Beijing and Washington</li> </ul><p></p><p>Whereas in China…</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It was explored in my last article that China tightened control on graphite to dampen the West’s energy sector. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">More actions include the raid of Bain and Mitz offices, banned purchase of chips from US chipmaker, Micron. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Other deals include: </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">In 2018, Broadcom bid for Qualcomm at $142bn, which was blocked by Trump, for national security concerns, despite Broadcom being an SG company at the time. Since then, Broadcom relocated to the US and is headquartered there. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Intel called off its $5.4bn acquisition of Israel-based Tower Semiconductor after failing to secure regulatory approval from China</li> </ul><p></p><p>This additional information can be totally wrong, so it really is me throwing a prompt here inviting more comments: </p><p>While I’m not an expert on chips, I did have a brief read on the book “Chips Act”, where the science behind chip manufacturing is briefly discussed. I vaguely remember an explanation on why it is difficult to catch up to chip technology because of something called “Moore’s Law”. If my understanding is correct, the law behind chip-making essentially creates a permanent gap between a chip factory that invents a new chip in say 2020 versus a chip that catches up later at 2023. The 3 year-gap cannot be closed due to Moore’s Law, which explains TSMC's unrivalled growth.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="al97, post: 151658, member: 29424"] 22 Oct - Commercial Awareness - Tech Topic: How US Export Control on Chips Hindered the $69bn Broadcom-VMware deal [URL]https://www.ft.com/content/b23d2a9f-d873-43e4-9032-632d4e9d438c[/URL] The Export Control restricted Chinese chip growth in three different ways [LIST] [*]One, only outdated chips made fell within the permitted grade. [*]Two, chips that have already been tailor-made for Chinese companies cannot be shipped. [*]Three, US companies cannot ship to China or even their subsidiaries in the states. [/LIST] US chipmaker Broadcom’s acquisition of cloud software VM was made in May 2022 [LIST] [*]⅓ of Broadcom’s $33bn billion last year came from shipment to China [*]Beijing is likely to delay or block the transaction now that US tightened the export control. [*]Shares price of VM dropped about 9%, Broadcom 2% [*]Chinese M&A regulatory process now involves another layer of review that involves consultations with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs [*]In other words, Broadcom catches itself at the worst timing amidst export control war between Beijing and Washington [/LIST] Whereas in China… [LIST] [*]It was explored in my last article that China tightened control on graphite to dampen the West’s energy sector. [*]More actions include the raid of Bain and Mitz offices, banned purchase of chips from US chipmaker, Micron. [*]Other deals include: [*]In 2018, Broadcom bid for Qualcomm at $142bn, which was blocked by Trump, for national security concerns, despite Broadcom being an SG company at the time. Since then, Broadcom relocated to the US and is headquartered there. [*]Intel called off its $5.4bn acquisition of Israel-based Tower Semiconductor after failing to secure regulatory approval from China [/LIST] This additional information can be totally wrong, so it really is me throwing a prompt here inviting more comments: While I’m not an expert on chips, I did have a brief read on the book “Chips Act”, where the science behind chip manufacturing is briefly discussed. I vaguely remember an explanation on why it is difficult to catch up to chip technology because of something called “Moore’s Law”. If my understanding is correct, the law behind chip-making essentially creates a permanent gap between a chip factory that invents a new chip in say 2020 versus a chip that catches up later at 2023. The 3 year-gap cannot be closed due to Moore’s Law, which explains TSMC's unrivalled growth. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
My Training Contract Journey
My Daily Commitment
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…