Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Law Firm Directory
Apply to Paul, Weiss
Forums
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Deadlines
TCLA TV
Members
Leaderboards
Premium Database
Premium Chat
Commercial Awareness
Future Trainee Advice
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask A Graduate Recruiter Anything!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jessica Booker" data-source="post: 81667" data-attributes="member: 2672"><p>I don't think that is how it was meant to be interpreted. It says you don't want to undermine the partner, and you would do this if you contradict what the partner has already said (e.g. they will look into it and come back to them after the meeting). You are undermining what the partner has just said by the trying to answer the question in the meeting.</p><p></p><p>The partner will expand with their expertise after the meeting in "the answer". You are basically forcing the partner to then respond in the meeting and clearly the partner doesn't want to do that. By choosing the most effective answer, you are inputting into "the answer" back to the client which will be much more thorough and considered, as it will include your work and the partners expertise in a considered way (not rushed in a meeting).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jessica Booker, post: 81667, member: 2672"] I don't think that is how it was meant to be interpreted. It says you don't want to undermine the partner, and you would do this if you contradict what the partner has already said (e.g. they will look into it and come back to them after the meeting). You are undermining what the partner has just said by the trying to answer the question in the meeting. The partner will expand with their expertise after the meeting in "the answer". You are basically forcing the partner to then respond in the meeting and clearly the partner doesn't want to do that. By choosing the most effective answer, you are inputting into "the answer" back to the client which will be much more thorough and considered, as it will include your work and the partners expertise in a considered way (not rushed in a meeting). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Our company is called, "The Corporate ___ Academy". What is the missing word here?
Post reply
Forums
Aspiring Lawyers - Applications & General Advice
Applications Discussion
Ask A Graduate Recruiter Anything!
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…