Hi Jessica,
I'm currently working on an application to Anderson Strathern, and I'm unsure how to tackle a few of the questions. They appear to have two different "why us/why you" questions, with one reading "Why have you chosen to apply to Anderson Strathern? (100 words)" and the other reading "What contribution do you think you would make to Anderson Strathern if appointed? In your response, please consider potential business generation, innovation and entrepreneurial input (200 words)."
What approach would you recommend taking to each question? I was thinking along the lines of not making the first question too personal, and 'saving' my personal skills/attributes/experience which make me a good fit for the firm for the second question. However, if I don't link the first question back to my own skills and attributes, could I risk 'deal dropping' and sounding as if I've just regurgitated the firm's website?
Thanks in advance for your help!
I'm currently working on an application to Anderson Strathern, and I'm unsure how to tackle a few of the questions. They appear to have two different "why us/why you" questions, with one reading "Why have you chosen to apply to Anderson Strathern? (100 words)" and the other reading "What contribution do you think you would make to Anderson Strathern if appointed? In your response, please consider potential business generation, innovation and entrepreneurial input (200 words)."
What approach would you recommend taking to each question? I was thinking along the lines of not making the first question too personal, and 'saving' my personal skills/attributes/experience which make me a good fit for the firm for the second question. However, if I don't link the first question back to my own skills and attributes, could I risk 'deal dropping' and sounding as if I've just regurgitated the firm's website?
Thanks in advance for your help!