There's a chance that some TC offer holders, for different reasons, are unable to accept their offers. In that case, the game is on. But I wouldn't bet the farm on succeeding.
If you politely ask for a follow-up (in a non-intrusive way), I don't see any harm in doing that. But if he doesn't reply again, he is probably too busy.
A firm requires the following on my CV: a full classification and percentage breakdown of all academic results.
Does this ALSO require a full module breakdown of my (equivalent) A-level and GSCE results? (other than summaries). I'm afraid the CV is going to look colossal with so many module...
I would absolutely include all the experience that you have! It's great that you can show a variety of experiences (both legal and non-legal), especially as you probably have trained different skills.
From experience, I've had no issues spelling out numbers under 10. I think it's safer to stick to this grammatical norm (unless it's exceptionally unclear to read otherwise, but which I think would be rare)
Do you have any sources on this? Or is this just the 'norm' for PS? I think I previously progressed with a PS by including a short introduction and ending (beyond the core elements of a PS)
Latham 'strongly recommends' not to re-apply in the same application cycle.
Should I just presume there is no real chance to succeed in the same application cycle (vac scheme / direct TC) even though I believe my application has significantly improved?
Other firms say (differently) that they...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.